Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrfox
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 103

    #1

    RSEM: directly compare the gene expression ratio in the same sample?

    Hi all,
    I wonder if I could use RSEM value to compare the expression level of 2 genes directly? For instance, gene A's RSEM value is 100, gene B's RSEM value is 200. Then can I say the expression ratio is 2 (gene B vs gene A)?

    I have been using FPKM and raw counts but did not have a chance to read the detailed RSEM algorithm.

    Thanks!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    You certainly can't use raw or even expected counts for this, though FPKM could work. Things that need to be kept in mind when comparing two genes are: (1) gene length differences need to be accounted for (FPKM should handle this), (2) GC content differences need to be accounted for, (3) differences in 5' or 3' bias need to be accounted for. You might be interested in using Salmon rather than RSEM, since it's mentioned in the preprint that it can account for at least some (possibly all, I'd have to check) of these issues.

    Comment

    • mrfox
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 103

      #3
      Thanks dpryan for the reply. I agree with you that the gene/transcript length, GC content, 3'UTR bias should be considered. I will definitely try Salmon when having a chance.

      Comment

      • lpachter
        Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 40

        #4
        You need to be careful in comparing genes within a single sample, especially if you intend to argue for a "statistically significant" difference. In the absence of replicates you will be unable to determine the extent to which differences are meaningful.

        Having said that, if you use the bootstraps in kallisto you will at least be able to assess part of the technical variance (due to the random sequencing of the library and uncertainty introduced in quantification). sleuth uses that information in differential analysis but it will require biological replicates. In other words, with a set of biological replicates in a single condition you can use sleuth to compare two different genes. Otherwise you will be embarking on an ill-advised fishing expedition.

        Comment

        • mrfox
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 103

          #5
          Hi lpachter,

          Thanks a lot for the advice. I agree that lacking biological replicates would not lead to meaningful p-values. I just checked the relative expression ratios, according to my collaborators' request, but did not perform any test.

          May I ask you an un-relevant question: for a group of 10 co-expressed genes, may I use the average of the log2(RSEM+1) of these 10 genes to roughly represent the general expression profile? If so, it will be convenient to correlate this single average value to other features.

          Thank you again!

          Originally posted by lpachter View Post
          You need to be careful in comparing genes within a single sample, especially if you intend to argue for a "statistically significant" difference. In the absence of replicates you will be unable to determine the extent to which differences are meaningful.

          Having said that, if you use the bootstraps in kallisto you will at least be able to assess part of the technical variance (due to the random sequencing of the library and uncertainty introduced in quantification). sleuth uses that information in differential analysis but it will require biological replicates. In other words, with a set of biological replicates in a single condition you can use sleuth to compare two different genes. Otherwise you will be embarking on an ill-advised fishing expedition.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          41 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...