Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • andreanna05
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 6

    multisample variant calling and consensus sequences

    Hi,

    I have used BWA to map reads from ~45 individuals of my favorite species to a reference (haploid) mitochondrial DNA sequence. My goal is to get a consensus sequence for each individual, which I then want to use in a skyline plot of effective population size in BEAST.

    In the past I have used samtools/bcftools/vcfutils.pl to create a consensus sequence. Using these commands it seems like you make a pileup, call variant sites, and then convert to fastq.

    A couple of my individuals have low depth, and I have been considering how to handle them (without throwing them out). I thought perhaps I could follow the general steps above and do a multisample variant call, filter the variants, and then make the fastq for each individual.

    I have tried several different things and none have worked. Here is one example:

    samtools-1.2 mpileup -ugf Ref.fasta Individual1.bam Individual2.bam Individual3.bam Individual4.bam Individual5.bam | bcftools-1.2 call -vmO z –S samples.txt -o Variants.vcf.gz

    bcftools-1.2 filter -e 'QUAL<30 | MIN(DP)<10' Variants.vcf.gz >Variants_Filter.vcf

    vcfutils-1.2.pl subsam Variants_Filter.vcf Individual1.bam > Individual1.vcf

    vcfutils-1.2.pl vcf2fq -d 2 Individual1.vcf > Individual1.fastq

    This gives:
    Code:
    @Individual1
    nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnAnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnMnnnn…..
    where the A is call of the alternate allele in this individual and the M is actually a well-supported call of the reference sequence at this site (not sure why it is given as an ambiguity). I guess I have lost the information about the non-variant sites along the way.

    Any suggestions for a better way to go about handling my low depth individuals?

    Beyond trying the multisample variant calling, I also tried to get positions in the consensus sequence with depth less than some minimum to be output as N, but the best I can do is get them output in lower case from vcfutils (presumably I would have to use regex to change them to N)

    I have thought about simply using the SNPs in BEAST (as opposed to the consensus sequence) but for effective population sizes, it seems like the relative numbers of variable and invariable sites might have some information?
    Last edited by Brian Bushnell; 08-07-2015, 08:43 PM. Reason: formatting
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    What kind of depth do you have? Mapping the reads to mito with very high sensitivity, keeping those that map, and assembling them with a normal assembler should work.

    Comment

    • andreanna05
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 6

      #3
      Most are > 10x, but I have two at 5x and two at 2x. These lower depth individuals are from ancient DNA so I merged the reads and then mapped. I can do tests about the impact of missing data, but I want to make sure the positions that are called are as accurate as possible.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
      0 responses
      60 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...