Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tirohia
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 47

    collapsing multiple genes into a meta-gene.

    The end goal is to cluster some time series data.

    Using multiple different methods, I've identified a number of differentially expressed genes over a timecourse.
    I've got two possible sets of genes I can work with. ~2,000 out of ~70,000 genes have been identified as differentially expressed by at 3 out of the 5 methods I'm using. Or alternatively ~200 have been identified by all 5 methods.

    The 3000 gene set is to big to cluster - BHC can deal with time series data (I can use it on the smaller dataset), but on a data set that size it locks up the machine overnight and then crashes.
    How does one go about reducing the dimensionality of the set? As in, I'd like to collapse groups of genes with similar expression profiles within that 2,000 to be represented by a single metagene. Or are there better methods of clustering time series data?

    The bioconductor package Farm, appears to do this, but only for data presented in affybatch form, which I don't have - mines all RNASeq data in an expressionSet.

    Cheers
    Ben.
  • sphil
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 192

    #2
    If I understand correctly you want to reduce your dimensionality without loosing information (as far as possible). What comes into my mind is that you need some kind of pre clustering using some sort of algorithm without having much apriori information. So, I'd recommend looking into it using DBSCAN as a clustering algorithm...
    It really needs minimal settings to work reasonably well and can cluster similar genes over the course into one cluster. After that you can work with one representative of those cluster in your downstream analysis. Another thing would be SOMs (self-organizing maps). Haven't done a lot with those, tbh.

    HTH

    Phil

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...