Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kotoro
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 31

    Normalizing mutation counts by Gene size

    What would the recommended standard be for doing a normalization to eliminate or reduce the impact of gene size, and where should I go to obtain the data to do this?

    I am working with TCGA MAF files so I have entrez IDs and Hugo names for the genes. I would like to normalize the counts according to the size of the gene.

    I THINK tcga only includes mutations that were within the expressed sequences, but I would have to double check to be sure. (if any of you know the answer for certain that would be appreciated.)

    Would the answer make a difference as to whether I should normalize only according to total number of nucleotides in exon sequences (and leave out the intron lengths?), or should I go for total gene start-stop length anyway?

    The data is Human data. To be clear, by counts I mean # of mutations per gene, per sample or grouping of samples.
    Last edited by Kotoro; 08-24-2015, 08:24 AM.
  • Kotoro
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 31

    #2
    I'm surprised. I figured this one would be easy.

    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      I guess no one felt like answering. Normalize by total exonic length, thereby excluding introns. In theory, one could add a few bases per intron to account for finding splice-site mutations, but the difference due to that will be miniscule. You can get that from Ensembl/gencode/UCSC. Just parse the GTF file (it might be convenient to do this in R. I wouldn't be surprised if the UCSC table browser already has this info in some random table as well.

      Comment

      • Kotoro
        Member
        • May 2011
        • 31

        #4
        Thank you for your response. I figured that exon-length sums was the best way to go for this, but wasn't sure. Thanks. I've pulled down some stuff from UCSC and am starting to look at my options in terms of the table browser for gene lists.

        I don't really KNOW R, though I could easily find a library in either perl or python to use to compute the numbers relatively quickly. (something this simple doesn't warrant a C program I would think)

        Any idea which of the known human genes tracks in the genome browser would be best to pair up with the TCGA data? (their MAF files use Hugo gene symbol and Entrez Gene ID identifiers).
        Last edited by Kotoro; 09-05-2015, 08:50 PM.

        Comment

        • dpryan
          Devon Ryan
          • Jul 2011
          • 3478

          #5
          Yup, a little python or perl script would make more sense than something in C. I expect that the refseq track matches the best, since that would likely use Entrez IDs already.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...