Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dfitzgerald
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 1

    SAM Flags Explained Improved

    Hi all,

    Someone may have already done this, but I threw together what I think is an improved version of the Broad Explain SAM Flags tool. I find that tool very helpful, but somewhat lacking in UI and visual design.

    In case you don't know what I'm talking about: https://broadinstitute.github.io/pic...ain-flags.html

    My take: http://djf604.github.io/SAM-flags-explained-improved/

    The functionality is the exact same, my take just has some UI improvments.

    Feedback?
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Looks nice!

    One critique of both your version and the one from the Broad is that some of the wording isn't really correct. For example, "read reverse strand" isn't the meaning of bit 16. This is best demonstrated in something like bisulfite sequencing, where the reverse complement of a read may be what aligns (thus, bit 16 is set), but the read actually aligns to the forward strand (due to the reverse strand having a different sequence). The only change, then, that I would make is to maybe make a window appear with a longer description if someone hovers over something like "read reverse strand". That would allow you to keep the typically correct but not always plain English labels while allowing users a more complete understanding if they need it.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      Yesterday, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...