Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tujchl
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 74

    #1

    strange output from RSEM

    hi,
    I use RSEM (http://deweylab.biostat.wisc.edu/rsem/README.html) to analysis my RNA-seq data and want to summarize expression level of each RefSeq ID.
    the command I used is as below:
    rsem-calculate-expression -p 7 --fragment-length-min 51 --fragment-length-max 51 --fragment-length-mean 51 --fragment-length-sd 0
    BTW, the length of all my reads is 51bp

    I found that many isoform from the same gene got quite different TPM and FPKM. An example is as below:
    transcript_id gene_id length effective_length expected_count TPM FPKM IsoPct
    NM_001130147.1 CCDC77 2359 2309.00 317.27 16.83 11.21 100.00
    NM_001130148.1 CCDC77 2305 2255.00 2.23 0.12 0.08 100.00

    as you see. NM_001130147.1 and NM_001130148.1 are different isoform of CCDC77 and the mRNA seq is quite similar with each other. but the TPM as well as FPKM is quite different which I regard it as err.

    Does anyone meet the err? can you help me?
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Why do you consider that to be an error? Typically there's only one major isoform.

    Comment

    • tujchl
      Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 74

      #3
      thank you for your replying, dpryan:

      because the mRNA seq of these two isoforms are nearly the same. Most of the reads mapped to NM_001130147.1 can also be mapped to NM_001130148.1. So I think the expression level of these two isoforms should be nearly the same.

      Am I right?

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        No, just because most of the reads can map to both doesn't mean the expression was more or less the same. That's the entire point of programs like RSEM, have a read through the paper for details.

        Comment

        • tujchl
          Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 74

          #5
          Thank you, dpryan
          To be honest, I didn`t read the papper. Now I think it`s the time to read it.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...