Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sonia.bao
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 12

    #1

    Sequencing failed only on one strand within a specific genomic region

    Hello everybody,

    I had a strange observation from the sequencing alignment of our cohort and was wondering whether you could help me. We sequenced several members of a family using Illumina whole exome sequencing, and I aligned the reads with bwa mem and novoalign (without trimming prior to alignment). Within one particular genomic region, which is protein-coding, exonic and very unique (the only hit from BLAT against human genome, and mappability is 1.0), the base quality is really bad only for the reverse strand, not for the plus strand, and this happens to every sample we sequenced. Any base outside of this particular region is totally fine.

    Here is a screen shot of the alignment (viewed in UCSC Genome Browser):



    Figure shown is about 100bp window.

    Within this short genomic region, on the reverse strand, the base quality is consistently lower than 5 for ~95% of the reads, resulting many sequencing errors (as shown in the figure). Only a small fraction (~5%) of the reads from the reverse strand are still high quality for the same string of bases (baseQ>30).

    I have been thinking of complex structure variants, lane bias, bad sample handling at the center, etc. but none of those could be the reason because the same sequencing failure was observed across different samples, sequencing platforms (Illumina GAII and HiSeq2000), sequencing centers (we had samples sequenced at two centers), exon capture kids (some samples used NimbleGen and some Agilent), lanes, R1/R2 of the pairs, different aligners. Therefore, it is likely to be intrinsic to the samples themselves. But I couldn't came out with a good explanation. All samples are germline samples from patients who developed tumors.

    Any comments and suggestions will be extremely appreciated! Thanks =)

    Cheers,
    Sonia
    Last edited by sonia.bao; 10-16-2015, 12:20 PM.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    Looks like some kind of misassembled collapsed repeat or hypervariable region. The mapping in the area is probably suspect and should be ignored for the purposes of calling variations with respect to that reference.

    Comment

    • ECO
      --Site Admin--
      • Oct 2007
      • 1360

      #3
      Whats the region? Looks like a low-complexity repeat.

      Comment

      • sonia.bao
        Member
        • May 2012
        • 12

        #4
        Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
        Looks like some kind of misassembled collapsed repeat or hypervariable region. The mapping in the area is probably suspect and should be ignored for the purposes of calling variations with respect to that reference.
        Thank you Brian. I was thinking of this too but if that was the case, would it affect both plus and minus strands? I was puzzled by the fact that only one strand is affected!

        Comment

        • sonia.bao
          Member
          • May 2012
          • 12

          #5
          Originally posted by ECO View Post
          Whats the region? Looks like a low-complexity repeat.
          Thank you ECO. The region is chr5:31,526,200-31,526,300 on hg19 assembly. It is a unique region with no repetitive elements.

          More updates: I checked another cohort that we sequenced at a different center and on a different date. It is the same!! The minus strand is really bad just for this region. It seems a universal problem.....

          Comment

          • Brian Bushnell
            Super Moderator
            • Jan 2014
            • 2709

            #6
            There are also certain motifs that interfere with the sequencing enzymes... or so I hear. That can cause sequencing to be unsuccessful in one direction.

            But, I think this is a misassembled repeat. The right side does not have totally random errors; rather, there are discrete positions where many reads agree on an alternate allele. Maybe there's a misassembly because it's hard to sequence with any technology due to a structural issue like a hairpin, or being slippery.

            Comment

            • GenoMax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 7142

              #7
              Have you thought about trying a re-aligner to see if it improves the alignment. ABRA is one example.

              Comment

              • sonia.bao
                Member
                • May 2012
                • 12

                #8
                Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
                There are also certain motifs that interfere with the sequencing enzymes... or so I hear. That can cause sequencing to be unsuccessful in one direction.

                But, I think this is a misassembled repeat. The right side does not have totally random errors; rather, there are discrete positions where many reads agree on an alternate allele. Maybe there's a misassembly because it's hard to sequence with any technology due to a structural issue like a hairpin, or being slippery.
                Thanks Brian. I took a closer look to the samples and indeed those errors are not completely random. They always pop up at the same spot across multiple samples.

                As a next step, I took the minus strand sequence from the erroneous region and checked whether it may form certain type of secondary structure:

                >chr5:31526227-31526292 strand=-
                CGGGAGCGAGGCCGCAGTCCCGACAGGAGAAGACAAGACAGCCGGTACAGATCTGATTATGACCGA

                Using this RNA/DNA structure prediction program (http://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstr...Web/index.html)

                The result suggested there is strong second structure forming within this DNA sequence!! Almost all bases have probability >= 80% (chr5_DNA_secondaryStr.sequencingBad.minus.pdf, attached)

                I also took the plus strand sequence and the second structure is similar. (chr5_DNA_secondaryStr.sequencingBad.plus.pdf)

                As a control, I took DNA sequence of similar length from a region where the sequencing was good:

                >chr5:31526292-31526358 strand=-
                TATGATGACCACAGGCACCGAGATCACAGTCATGGGCGAGGTGAGAGGCATCGGTCCCTGGATCGGC

                And the prediction result suggested certain structure may form but nothing is strong. (chr5_DNA_secondaryStr.sequencingOK.pdf, also attached)

                So this could be the reason!
                Last edited by sonia.bao; 10-17-2015, 05:28 PM.

                Comment

                • sonia.bao
                  Member
                  • May 2012
                  • 12

                  #9
                  Here are the predicted DNA secondary structure output files
                  Attached Files

                  Comment

                  • sonia.bao
                    Member
                    • May 2012
                    • 12

                    #10
                    Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
                    Have you thought about trying a re-aligner to see if it improves the alignment. ABRA is one example.
                    Thanks GenoMax. I was using GATK for indel realignment. ABRA sounds like another good option! How does it compare to GATK?

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • SEQadmin2
                      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                      ...
                      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                      by SEQadmin2


                      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                      ...
                      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                    0 responses
                    22 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                    0 responses
                    19 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                    0 responses
                    36 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                    0 responses
                    42 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...