Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • camhabib
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 1

    #1

    Best way to detect SNV / InDels against reference genome?

    So I've done a bit of homework but I'm still a little confused on the best way to go, hoping someone can point me in the right direction.

    I recently sequenced 11 mutant strains and 1 reference strain of Bacillus (~4MB) by NextSeq Mid 2 x 75. I'm ultimately looking to compare the mutants to the reference to detect SNV/MNV as well as InDels.

    So far, my understanding is to start with a de novo assembly using something like SPADes. Once I have the contigs, I can use OSLay to map these back to a reference strain, either the one I sequenced, or a previously available (master) one, of which there are several. I still have a few questions though:

    1) What application should I be looking at for detecting the mutations? I imagine I'd essentially need a large alignment tool, though one that can take in to account coverage and probability of mutation would be a great feature to have (assuming not all reads give the same SNV, etc).

    2) When detecting mutations, is it better to do so against the reference strain that I sequenced or against a downloaded one and just compare my reference to it as well, ignoring any commonalities?

    3) Are there better programs to use than the two I listed above? Are there any that are specifically built for my purpose, and that aren't CLC Genomics that would cost me $5k (grad student budget here)?

    Much appreciated everyone!
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    For #2, it depends how far distant the reference sequence is to your strains. It is usually best to do mapping instead of de novo assembly and if appropriate I would do that first. BBMap or Bowtie2 or BWA followed by Samtools or GATK is a good way to call SNVs. BEDtools can be used for coverage maps which will indicate longer deletions. Assembling unmapped reads can indicate longer insertions.

    There are lots of programs out there and the people on the forum may suggest other, and better, ones. But in general you should be able to do your analysis on a "grad student's budget"; e.g., not much cash but lots of time.

    Comment

    • piet
      Member
      • Aug 2014
      • 21

      #3
      Originally posted by camhabib View Post
      I recently sequenced 11 mutant strains and 1 reference strain of Bacillus (~4MB) by NextSeq Mid 2 x 75. I'm ultimately looking to compare the mutants to the reference to detect SNV/MNV as well as InDels.
      I assume that the 11 mutants are offsprings of the "reference strain" which have been generated by some mutagenic treatment. Now they show different phenotype and you want to find the genetic basis for that.

      You should first assemble the genome of the parent. Unfortunately, 75-nt reads are suboptimal for this. Nevertheless, I would recomment to assemble them with spades. That will take about 5 to 10 minutes on a desktop PC, just try it out. If you are lucky the contigs will cover about 90 percent of the whole genome.

      Then you can map the reads of the mutants to the contigs of the parent. Inspect the mapping in a viewer like Tablet. Its always amazing to see how clearly SNP differ from random sequencing errors.

      To identify SNP programatically, you have to compute VCF files from your read mappings. A VCF file is kind of a human readable ASCII table, which lists all the SNP. My favorite to generate VCF files is freebayes.

      If there is a finished genome available for your parent strain or from a very closely related strain, then you should use that genome as recommended by Westerman.
      Last edited by piet; 10-22-2015, 11:50 AM.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...