Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MAPK
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 2

    SNP coverage using Pile up From RSamtools

    Hi, I am using pile up from R Package, ‘Rsamtools’. I could not get the correct coverage for the SNP positions I am looking for in my BAM files. The issue is that I do not have the strand information (+ or -) and keep missing some of the reads in my output. Is there a way to resolve this issue?

    Here are the parameters I am using for Pile up:
    Code:
    summary[1:5,]
    [1,] "chr1"  "115258748" "115258748"   
    [2,] "chr1"  "115258748" "115258748"    
    [3,] "chr1"  "115258747" "115258747"    
    [4,] "chr1"  "115258747" "115258747"    
    [5,] "chr1"  "115258747" "115258747"    
    
    data <- summary ### summary could be a subset of a.indel - . a.indel[wanted,core.ann.gr)
    data.gr <- GRanges(seqnames =data[,"chr"],ranges = IRanges(start=as.numeric(data[,"start"]),end=as.numeric(data[,"end"])))
    
    which <-   data.gr
    which
    # GRanges object with 103 ranges and 0 metadata columns:
    #   seqnames                 ranges strand
    # <Rle>              <IRanges>  <Rle>
    #   [1]     chr1 [115258748, 115258748]      
    #   [2]     chr1 [115258748, 115258748]      
    #   [3]     chr1 [115258747, 115258747]      
    #   [4]     chr1 [115258747, 115258747]      
    
    params <-ScanBamParam(which=which,flag=scanBamFlag(isUnmappedQuery=FALSE,isDuplicate=FALSE,isNotPassingQualityControls=FALSE),simpleCigar = FALSE,reverseComplement = FALSE,what=c("qname","flag","rname","seq","strand","pos","qwidth","cigar","qual","mapq") )  ### NOTE isValidVendorRead=FALSE shoudl be TRUE
    
    
    param.pile <- PileupParam(max_depth=2500, min_base_quality=0, min_mapq=0,min_nucleotide_depth=1, min_minor_allele_depth=0,distinguish_strands=TRUE, distinguish_nucleotides=TRUE,ignore_query_Ns=TRUE, include_deletions=TRUE,cycle_bins=numeric() )
    #minimum base quality 20
    Last edited by MAPK; 11-05-2015, 11:45 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...