Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MAPK
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 2

    #1

    SNP coverage using Pile up From RSamtools

    Hi, I am using pile up from R Package, ‘Rsamtools’. I could not get the correct coverage for the SNP positions I am looking for in my BAM files. The issue is that I do not have the strand information (+ or -) and keep missing some of the reads in my output. Is there a way to resolve this issue?

    Here are the parameters I am using for Pile up:
    Code:
    summary[1:5,]
    [1,] "chr1"  "115258748" "115258748"   
    [2,] "chr1"  "115258748" "115258748"    
    [3,] "chr1"  "115258747" "115258747"    
    [4,] "chr1"  "115258747" "115258747"    
    [5,] "chr1"  "115258747" "115258747"    
    
    data <- summary ### summary could be a subset of a.indel - . a.indel[wanted,core.ann.gr)
    data.gr <- GRanges(seqnames =data[,"chr"],ranges = IRanges(start=as.numeric(data[,"start"]),end=as.numeric(data[,"end"])))
    
    which <-   data.gr
    which
    # GRanges object with 103 ranges and 0 metadata columns:
    #   seqnames                 ranges strand
    # <Rle>              <IRanges>  <Rle>
    #   [1]     chr1 [115258748, 115258748]      
    #   [2]     chr1 [115258748, 115258748]      
    #   [3]     chr1 [115258747, 115258747]      
    #   [4]     chr1 [115258747, 115258747]      
    
    params <-ScanBamParam(which=which,flag=scanBamFlag(isUnmappedQuery=FALSE,isDuplicate=FALSE,isNotPassingQualityControls=FALSE),simpleCigar = FALSE,reverseComplement = FALSE,what=c("qname","flag","rname","seq","strand","pos","qwidth","cigar","qual","mapq") )  ### NOTE isValidVendorRead=FALSE shoudl be TRUE
    
    
    param.pile <- PileupParam(max_depth=2500, min_base_quality=0, min_mapq=0,min_nucleotide_depth=1, min_minor_allele_depth=0,distinguish_strands=TRUE, distinguish_nucleotides=TRUE,ignore_query_Ns=TRUE, include_deletions=TRUE,cycle_bins=numeric() )
    #minimum base quality 20
    Last edited by MAPK; 11-05-2015, 11:45 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...