Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sbcn
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 16

    #1

    DESeq LRT / 2-way ANOVA?

    Dear all,

    Let's start from the experiment (RNA-seq) I would like to analyse:
    3 time points (t0, t1, t3)
    2 different parts of the brain (front, back)
    2 different layers of the brain - say horizontal layers which go from front to back (layer1, layer2)

    All experimental groups are present in triplicates, for a total of 36 samples.

    I would like to check genes that change over time, and the influence of either the parts of the brain, or the layers of the brains, or both, on that change.

    If I understand correctly, I should go for a likelihood ratio test (LRT) in DESeq2.

    If I wanted to check only the influence of the brain part over time on gene expression changes, I would go for the following design:

    testLRT <- DESeq(ddseq, test="LRT", full = ~ time + part + timeart, reduced = ~ time + part)

    correct?

    But when I want to include in that analysis the "layers", and study the possible interactions that they may have with the parts of the brain over time, it is a little more complex...

    Suggestions:

    testLRT <- DESeq(ddseq, test="LRT", full = ~ time + part + layer + timeart + time:layer, reduced= ~ time + part + layer)
    or
    testLRT <- DESeq(ddseq, test="LRT", full = ~ time + part*layer, reduced= ~ time + part + layer)

    Does one of them make sense?

    Thanks!

    Sarah
    Last edited by sbcn; 11-16-2015, 09:42 AM.
  • sbcn
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 16

    #2
    Anyone?

    Hi, does someone have an opinion or some tip about this?
    Thanks!

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...