Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • a11msp
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 26

    SNP visualisation

    Hi everyone,

    I'm wondering if there's a consensus of what tools to use to visualise SNPs.
    I have the data in the form of a SNP table across a number of individuals, and my wet-lab collaborators ask for a map of specific loci, ideally overlaid with genome annotation data.

    The SNP table has been assembled from short-read sequencing data
    (bowtie assembly -> samtools SNP calling -> samtools pileup per individual -> merger and some additional filtering).

    The collaborators really just want to see the SNP positions (and what is there), not the underlying quality/coverage etc.

    A quick search for available tools revealed:
    - GeneSNP-VISTA (works with FASTA; I can indeed convert my SNP tables into FASTA per individual, but the application didn't start on my Mac)
    - Tablet (looks cool, but is designed for quality/coverage formats such as SAM/BAM)

    Would appreciate any recommendation, thanks!
  • severin
    Genome Informatics Facility
    • Sep 2009
    • 105

    #2
    SNP Visualization using R

    I usually find when I am asked for a very specific task that it is easier to just
    write an R function to get exactly what you want. Chances are that you already know the SNP coordinates and the sizes of the chromosomes. So it should be relatively straight forward to generate a scaled version of the chromosomes and plot the relative positions. Depending on your needs you could also see if there is any clustering of your SNPs that might indicate a region of introgression (if you have two near isogenic lines). You will want to account for gene density of course. I find a bootstrap algorithm works well for this.

    If you want an example of an R script, look at the supplementary materials of
    this paper that we just published.

    Comment

    • adamdeluca
      Member
      • Jul 2010
      • 95

      #3
      I think your best bet would be to create custom annotation tracks for the UCSC browser. You could make the mapped reads and the SNPs available to your collaborators and they could turn tracks on and off as they please.

      List of comparable formats:


      I use bed for SNPs, bam for the reads, and bigwig for coverage data.

      Comment

      • a11msp
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 26

        #4
        Thanks to both of you for the suggestions!
        I think I'll follow the route suggested by adamdeluca and convert my SNP tables to a series of bed files

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...