Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liux
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 30

    #1

    ribosomal genes in differentially expressed gene list

    a lab with partially degraded mRNAseq samples came back with a list of DE genes. And there are a few ribosomal protein genes in the list, which are not supposed to be there. How did this happen, and is there a way to 'fix' it, assuming the samples are not replaceable.

    The analysis was done with RSEM after aligned to genome with STAR, and the DE analysis was done with EdgeR.

    Thanks!
  • liux
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 30

    #2
    any suggestion?

    Comment

    • blancha
      Senior Member
      • May 2013
      • 367

      #3
      Since no one has tried to answer this question, I will try, to the best of my ability.

      First, since you mention that the RNA was partially degraded, start by checking the RIN (RNA Integrity Number). If it's too low, just walk away from the analysis. Trust me. This is the best advice that any one can give on trying to make sense of degraded RNA.

      Second, check how the ribosomal RNA was removed. Was poly-A enrichment used or a ribosomal depletion kit? One one occasion, I've had a researcher skip the ribosomal depletion kit. On two occasions, I've had researchers use the wrong ribosomal depletion kit or technique on Drosophila data.

      Third, if the proportion of ribosomal RNA reads is significant, you have two choices to remove the ribosomal RNA reads in silico. You can either remove the rRNA reads before aligning to the reference genome by discarding reads that align to a FASTA file containing only the rRNA sequences. Or you have the option, with Cuffdiff at least, to discard the counts from the rRNA reads, after the alignment to the reference genome, with the option --mask-file.

      If the proportion of reads from ribosomal genes is not significant, I wouldn't actually do anything, other than to remember to disregard the ribosomal genes in the downstream analysis.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      39 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...