Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liux
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 30

    #1

    ribosomal genes in differentially expressed gene list

    a lab with partially degraded mRNAseq samples came back with a list of DE genes. And there are a few ribosomal protein genes in the list, which are not supposed to be there. How did this happen, and is there a way to 'fix' it, assuming the samples are not replaceable.

    The analysis was done with RSEM after aligned to genome with STAR, and the DE analysis was done with EdgeR.

    Thanks!
  • liux
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 30

    #2
    any suggestion?

    Comment

    • blancha
      Senior Member
      • May 2013
      • 367

      #3
      Since no one has tried to answer this question, I will try, to the best of my ability.

      First, since you mention that the RNA was partially degraded, start by checking the RIN (RNA Integrity Number). If it's too low, just walk away from the analysis. Trust me. This is the best advice that any one can give on trying to make sense of degraded RNA.

      Second, check how the ribosomal RNA was removed. Was poly-A enrichment used or a ribosomal depletion kit? One one occasion, I've had a researcher skip the ribosomal depletion kit. On two occasions, I've had researchers use the wrong ribosomal depletion kit or technique on Drosophila data.

      Third, if the proportion of ribosomal RNA reads is significant, you have two choices to remove the ribosomal RNA reads in silico. You can either remove the rRNA reads before aligning to the reference genome by discarding reads that align to a FASTA file containing only the rRNA sequences. Or you have the option, with Cuffdiff at least, to discard the counts from the rRNA reads, after the alignment to the reference genome, with the option --mask-file.

      If the proportion of reads from ribosomal genes is not significant, I wouldn't actually do anything, other than to remember to disregard the ribosomal genes in the downstream analysis.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...