Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

comparaison to the reference genome

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • comparaison to the reference genome

    Hello,
    I generated reads a file (.fasta) I want to test the effectiveness of my file to the reference genome (before assembly).
    how to do?
    and what tool I have to use it to make the comparison of my file with the reference genome?
    Thank you

  • #2
    I suggest using Quast; it will compare your assembly to the reference. If you mean that you want to compare reads to an assembly, then you should use mapping, and a tool like ALE.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
      I suggest using Quast; it will compare your assembly to the reference. If you mean that you want to compare reads to an assembly, then you should use mapping, and a tool like ALE.
      to compare read file to the reference genome i should use mapping tools?
      like ALE?
      thanks

      Comment


      • #4
        If you want to compare reads, then map them, and then use ALE.

        Comment


        • #5
          hello,
          i used BBMAP for mapping and this is the results:
          Code:
             ------------------   Results   ------------------
          
          Genome:                 1
          Key Length:             13
          Max Indel:              16000
          Minimum Score Ratio:    0.56
          Mapping Mode:           normal
          Reads Used:             1626223 (793501894 bases)
          
          Mapping:                21520.101 seconds.
          Reads/sec:              75.57
          kBases/sec:             36.87
          
          
          Read 1 data:            pct reads       num reads       pct bases          num bases
          
          mapped:                  84.1693%         1368781        84.7943%          672844516
          unambiguous:             75.6937%         1230949        76.2771%          605259839
          ambiguous:                8.4756%          137832         8.5173%           67584677
          low-Q discards:           0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
          
          perfect best site:       72.2714%         1175294        73.8835%          586267084
          semiperfect site:        72.2780%         1175402        73.8902%          586320010
          
          Match Rate:                   NA               NA        94.7978%          668713525
          Error Rate:              13.8973%          193385         5.1976%           36664236
          Sub Rate:                12.5303%          174364         0.2647%            1867550
          Del Rate:                 6.0770%           84563         4.6165%           32565546
          Ins Rate:                 5.8459%           81348         0.3163%            2231140
          N Rate:                   0.0630%             877         0.0046%              32301
          do i have good results or not?
          and can explain these lines?
          thanks

          Comment


          • #6
            any response?

            Comment


            • #7
              First off, it is very important to clearly explain what you did. Mapping reads to their assembly is different than mapping to a reference; which did you do? And if you have a reference, what are you making reads and assemblies for? Is this a different strain, different species, or what? What kind of data do you have, from which platform?

              Those numbers are very useful when trying to determine which is a better assembly of two assemblies from the same reads, or which is a better set of reads when you have two libraries made from the same organism. However, it's hard to determine the absolute quality of an assembly just from the mapping results, since you don't know whether the mismatches are caused by misassemblies or low-quality data, or how much contamination there is, etc. The fact that 72.27% of the reads match the assembly perfectly is nice. But the fact that only 84.17% of the reads map to the assembly indicates that it is probably incomplete.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • seqadmin
                Targeted Sequencing: Choosing Between Hybridization Capture and Amplicon Sequencing
                by seqadmin




                Targeted sequencing is an effective way to sequence and analyze specific genomic regions of interest. This method enables researchers to focus their efforts on their desired targets, as opposed to other methods like whole genome sequencing that involve the sequencing of total DNA. Utilizing targeted sequencing is an attractive option for many researchers because it is often faster, more cost-effective, and only generates applicable data. While there are many approaches...
                03-10-2023, 05:31 AM
              • seqadmin
                Expert Advice on Automating Your Library Preparations
                by seqadmin



                Using automation to prepare sequencing libraries isn’t a new concept, and most researchers are aware that there are numerous benefits to automating this process. However, many labs are still hesitant to switch to automation and often believe that it’s not suitable for their lab. To combat these concerns, we’ll cover some of the key advantages, review the most important considerations, and get real-world advice from automation experts to remove any lingering anxieties....
                02-21-2023, 02:14 PM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by seqadmin, 03-17-2023, 12:32 PM
              0 responses
              8 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-15-2023, 12:42 PM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-09-2023, 10:17 AM
              0 responses
              66 views
              1 like
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2023, 12:03 PM
              0 responses
              64 views
              0 likes
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Working...
              X