Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mido1951
    Senior Member
    • May 2014
    • 123

    #1

    comparaison to the reference genome

    Hello,
    I generated reads a file (.fasta) I want to test the effectiveness of my file to the reference genome (before assembly).
    how to do?
    and what tool I have to use it to make the comparison of my file with the reference genome?
    Thank you
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I suggest using Quast; it will compare your assembly to the reference. If you mean that you want to compare reads to an assembly, then you should use mapping, and a tool like ALE.

    Comment

    • mido1951
      Senior Member
      • May 2014
      • 123

      #3
      Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
      I suggest using Quast; it will compare your assembly to the reference. If you mean that you want to compare reads to an assembly, then you should use mapping, and a tool like ALE.
      to compare read file to the reference genome i should use mapping tools?
      like ALE?
      thanks

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        If you want to compare reads, then map them, and then use ALE.

        Comment

        • mido1951
          Senior Member
          • May 2014
          • 123

          #5
          hello,
          i used BBMAP for mapping and this is the results:
          Code:
             ------------------   Results   ------------------
          
          Genome:                 1
          Key Length:             13
          Max Indel:              16000
          Minimum Score Ratio:    0.56
          Mapping Mode:           normal
          Reads Used:             1626223 (793501894 bases)
          
          Mapping:                21520.101 seconds.
          Reads/sec:              75.57
          kBases/sec:             36.87
          
          
          Read 1 data:            pct reads       num reads       pct bases          num bases
          
          mapped:                  84.1693%         1368781        84.7943%          672844516
          unambiguous:             75.6937%         1230949        76.2771%          605259839
          ambiguous:                8.4756%          137832         8.5173%           67584677
          low-Q discards:           0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
          
          perfect best site:       72.2714%         1175294        73.8835%          586267084
          semiperfect site:        72.2780%         1175402        73.8902%          586320010
          
          Match Rate:                   NA               NA        94.7978%          668713525
          Error Rate:              13.8973%          193385         5.1976%           36664236
          Sub Rate:                12.5303%          174364         0.2647%            1867550
          Del Rate:                 6.0770%           84563         4.6165%           32565546
          Ins Rate:                 5.8459%           81348         0.3163%            2231140
          N Rate:                   0.0630%             877         0.0046%              32301
          do i have good results or not?
          and can explain these lines?
          thanks

          Comment

          • mido1951
            Senior Member
            • May 2014
            • 123

            #6
            any response?

            Comment

            • Brian Bushnell
              Super Moderator
              • Jan 2014
              • 2709

              #7
              First off, it is very important to clearly explain what you did. Mapping reads to their assembly is different than mapping to a reference; which did you do? And if you have a reference, what are you making reads and assemblies for? Is this a different strain, different species, or what? What kind of data do you have, from which platform?

              Those numbers are very useful when trying to determine which is a better assembly of two assemblies from the same reads, or which is a better set of reads when you have two libraries made from the same organism. However, it's hard to determine the absolute quality of an assembly just from the mapping results, since you don't know whether the mismatches are caused by misassemblies or low-quality data, or how much contamination there is, etc. The fact that 72.27% of the reads match the assembly perfectly is nice. But the fact that only 84.17% of the reads map to the assembly indicates that it is probably incomplete.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              21 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              18 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              36 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              42 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...