Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yh_gu
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 4

    #1

    contig assembly

    Hello,

    We've de novo assembled our RNA-Seq reads (about 50 millions 2×75 reads) into contigs by several de novo assemblers with different parameters. Most of the contigs we’ve get were very short due to the poor sequencing quality and the low sequencing depth. The contigs from each assmbler under different parameters varied from eachother, but some of them had overlaps. So these contigs may be assembled into longer contigs. The problem is that we couldn't assemble millions of contigs into supercontigs manually. Moreover, our computer resources were very low (12G RAM, 8 core CPU, 500G spaces). Is anyone knows how to assmeble these contigs into longer contigs with our limited computer resources, and which software could handle the assemble task.

    Thanks

    YH-GU
    Last edited by yh_gu; 08-07-2010, 01:57 AM.
  • Zigster
    Jeremy Leipzig
    • May 2009
    • 117

    #2
    If you have enough memory to assemble reads into contigs then you clearly have enough memory to assemble contigs into supercontigs, as that is an easier feat.

    When an assembler produces contigs that ostensibly overlap and yet remain separate there is some likely path ambiguity that has not been resolved. It sounds like you'll need more paired-end sequence for your assembly to coalesce.
    --
    Jeremy Leipzig
    Bioinformatics Programmer
    --
    My blog
    Twitter

    Comment

    • natstreet
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 83

      #3
      The last is certainly true - but can anyone recommend the most suitable software tool for the task? I am currently looking to do something similar and so far have only tried PAVE (which died with an error message that I'm tracking down). In my case I have performed de novo assembly on a number of genotypes of the same species and now I want to merge those together, identify SNPs and see if longer ESTs can be made by merging contigs across the per-genotype assemblies.

      So, what are the current favourite tools for merging large numbers of contigs coming from de novo transcript assemblies of short read data?

      Comment

      • yh_gu
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 4

        #4
        Originally posted by Zigster View Post
        When an assembler produces contigs that ostensibly overlap and yet remain separate there is some likely path ambiguity that has not been resolved. It sounds like you'll need more paired-end sequence for your assembly to coalesce.
        The overlaps I've mentioned mainly refer to the contigs that produced by different assembler. So, we want to find a suitable software to assemble them longer.

        Comment

        • jmw86069
          Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 31

          #5
          Velvet seems to work fairly well with contig assemblies in my hands, though as Zigster pointed out, the assembly path ambiguity will ultimately prevent use of as much productive overlaps as you'd suspect because there will be discrepancies across assemblers in just the wrong places per contig.

          It may be interesting to "go conservative" with different assemblers' contigs by trimming away their weakpoints. E.g. maybe try trimming away low quality ends of contigs to minimize including ambiguous sequence spans in your secondary assembly. Otherwise you'd expect to get good overlaps in the middle of the contigs but not good alignments at the ends. But each assembler has its challenge area, so you may want to deal with each one in its own way. At some point we (the collective) should put together some cross-assembler lessons learned, and maybe pre-configurations that help tools like Velvet use each assembler's strengths more natively.

          Velvet does have numerous options to tweak though, which I think gives it promise, and you can try "oases" which is a layer on top of Velvet which is intended to allow for splice variants. Marcel Schulz and Daniel Zerbino seem to have put together a very useful (and timely) toolsuite for this type of work. Kudos to them, and thanks to them as well for providing it as they continue perfecting it.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...