Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • runnerBio88
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 10

    #1

    SAM output from bowtie2

    Hi

    I have some data from RNAseq which I'm going to map using tophat, but because I don't know the inner mate distance I'm mapping using bowtie2 to get to know this inner distance between reads (I took a subset of 25000 reads from the original data).

    The problem I'm having is related to the output, I find it little bit weird and I can't find the column with the inner mate distance (which should be the number 9). And by the way, I'm new into this data.

    This is the bowtie2 line:
    Code:
    bowtie2 --sensitive  -x /local/Reference/Homo_sapiens/UCSC/hg19/Sequence/Bowtie2Index/genome -1 Panc042_PDAC_PRITUM_Px00__raw_RNAseq_R1_SUBSET25000.fastq  -2 Panc042_PDAC_PRITUM_Px00__raw_RNAseq_R2_SUBSET25000.fastq -S bowtie2_subset/Pan042_PDCA_PRITUM_Px00_raw_RNAseq_subset.sam &> bowtie2_subset/log_bowtie2.txt
    Log
    Code:
    25000 reads; of these:
      25000 (100.00%) were paired; of these:
        7297 (29.19%) aligned concordantly 0 times
        12786 (51.14%) aligned concordantly exactly 1 time
        4917 (19.67%) aligned concordantly >1 times
        ----
        7297 pairs aligned concordantly 0 times; of these:
          2039 (27.94%) aligned discordantly 1 time
        ----
        5258 pairs aligned 0 times concordantly or discordantly; of these:
          10516 mates make up the pairs; of these:
            5801 (55.16%) aligned 0 times
            3773 (35.88%) aligned exactly 1 time
            942 (8.96%) aligned >1 times
    88.40% overall alignment rate
    First two lanes of sam file

    Code:
    HWI-ST1391:130419:D22RGACXX:4:1101:1389:2058    83      chr7    115578630       42      75M     =       115578540       -165    GATACAAGCTAAGCCTGAGATAATTATTATACAATAAGGATTTACTATTTTTCTCCTTTTATCAGCATTAGGGTC     EFC=F@@8)88(?*BIIIIIGDG@GCFD?:0:***?C??:9??1?>GEEBAA3<+AEEDE<C<$
    HWI-ST1391:130419:D22RGACXX:4:1101:1389:2058    163     chr7    115578540       42      75M     =       115578630       165     TCGGGCTTTAATGACTGTACCCAGAAGTTAGTAATTATTTTTCCATGTCAAACAATAAAATTATTTTAATTCTCC     1=:=+=@AFAA4CBE,<+<AEGC88AAFEC41:?C<9:C:DGEII4?*009BG;D/9B>>==B$

    Thanks.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    If you are only running bowtie2 to estimate insert size then you could use BBMerge: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showpos...99&postcount=2

    If you end up getting BBMap then using BBMap as a splice aware aligner is also a great option instead of TopHat.

    Comment

    • runnerBio88
      Member
      • Oct 2015
      • 10

      #3
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      If you are only running bowtie2 to estimate insert size then you could use BBMerge: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showpos...99&postcount=2

      If you end up getting BBMap then using BBMap as a splice aware aligner is also a great option instead of TopHat.
      Thanks I'll give a try to BBMerge to calculate insert size, as I'm not sure that using Bowtie2 to calculate this is a good option.

      Thanks

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        SAM files don't report the mate inner distance, they report the (apparent) fragment size, which is 165 rather than 9. The inner mate distance is just that minus the sum of the read lengths.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...