Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • starbug
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 5

    #1

    bwa paired read FR issue

    Hi,

    I have been trying to run the following bwa mem command:

    bwa mem -M -t 16 w_ind.fa SRR412532_1.fastq.gz SRR412532_2.fastq.gz | samtools view -Sb - | samtools sort - SRR412532.sorted && samtools index SRR412532.sorted.bam

    And for each iteration get the following:

    [M:rocess] read 1777778 sequences (160000020 bp)...
    [M::mem_pestat] # candidate unique pairs for (FF, FR, RF, RR): (0, 2, 0, 0)
    [M::mem_pestat] skip orientation FF as there are not enough pairs
    [M::mem_pestat] skip orientation FR as there are not enough pairs
    [M::mem_pestat] skip orientation RF as there are not enough pairs
    [M::mem_pestat] skip orientation RR as there are not enough pairs
    [M::mem_process_seqs] Processed 1777778 reads in 75.678 CPU sec, 22.324 real sec

    This shoud be a paired read dataset and when I check the FASTQ files I see:

    gzcat SRR412532_1.fastq.gz | head
    @SRR412532.1 FCC02L0ACXX:3:1101:1130:1956/1
    NGAGCTTCAGGCCCAGGCCAAGGCTTACTTTGAGAAGACGCAGGAGCAGCTAACACCCCTGGTCAAGAAGGCCGGAACTGACCTGATCAA
    +
    #1=DDDDEHHHGGIGHI=FHGGGIG>BAFGHC>=BCGG>:?DG?CB;FECE>CC@G1=5,,;?;@ACA;>;2=;'820>@>>>C<>@@A>
    @SRR412532.2 FCC02L0ACXX:3:1101:1035:1967/1
    NACAAAAAGCAAAATGAATCTAGCTGTCCCTGTCCTGGCCGGTATTCCATCTTCTAGAACCTGTTTCCGTGTTTTTCCTGGAGTGTCTGC
    +
    #1:BDFFFF?FHHIGEHIB@AHIGICFDEGGIHGEEHIIGEG?FFEDHIGGGIIIG;CGGGEGGHGA3;.;.?B@=@AC>>55(5>5;A#
    @SRR412532.3 FCC02L0ACXX:3:1101:1464:1954/1
    NTGCTTTTCTGCCCTGGAAGTTGATGAGGCATATGTTCCCAAAGAGTTTAACGCTGAAACATTCACCTTCCATGCAGACTTATGCACACT

    gzcat SRR412532_2.fastq.gz | head
    @SRR412532.1 FCC02L0ACXX:3:1101:1130:1956/2
    GTTGGGAGAGGGCTCCAGACCTGGCCAGTGGGGGTTCTAGGGGCCAGCAGGGGAGGGAAGACAATGGTCTGGACGCCTCACTGGGTGGCA
    +
    @B@?DDDDAHFHHIFHIJIGIGCHHIGI3?FGII7;FE@GHIBHAEB?@E;>>8?@2'588ACCCDC(44?9@AB><B9(8@A#######
    @SRR412532.2 FCC02L0ACXX:3:1101:1035:1967/2
    GGGTTTAGGGACCTCCCTGGGTGGAACAATCTACACGGTTGAAGCACTAGCAGGGAGGTTCTAGTGGGATCACACGTTTATTAACATGCT
    +
    ?@@=BDFFGHDFFGGHIGIHCFEHHGGHGHGGGGGHIDBFHIJCFHCAGIFGHGIHEB?;BBC>;AC6A>?=CDCB?A<BDDCDDCA@CC
    @SRR412532.3 FCC02L0ACXX:3:1101:1464:1954/2
    GGCTTGTGTTTCACCAGCTCAGCAAGTGCAGATTGTTTCTTGACTTGTTTCTCAGCCTCAGGAAGTGTGCATAAGACTGCATGGAAGGTG

    I am not sure why there are not enough FR pairs as the reads seem to be in the same order with matching headings... Am probably missing something obvious!!! Any ideas??

    All help much appreciated!!

    Thanks in advance
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Are you using current versions of bwa/samtools?

    Comment

    • starbug
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2013
      • 5

      #3
      bwa version 0.7.12 / samtools 1.2

      Have tried a couple of other SRA datasets with this bwa install and they map really nicely. Bit stumped as to what's different about this one...

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Have you done a quick count on the two files to make sure that there is an equal number of reads in them? (grep for "^@SRR412532" and do a line count on both files).

        Comment

        • starbug
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 5

          #5
          Ooh no I hadn't thought of that! Just given that a try now but both showing same count (26,073,197)

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            But it appears that bwa is only reading 1,777,778 sequences based on the log above so something is wrong with the files. Perhaps you can try to download them again?

            You can find the fastq files at EBI SRA: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SRR412532 if you don't want to deal with SRA.

            Comment

            • starbug
              Junior Member
              • Nov 2013
              • 5

              #7
              Have just downloaded the FASTQs from the EBI again (sorry, I should have mentioned I bypassed SRA) and still the same issue. Is it worth downloading them as SRAs with fastq-dump even though it will take longer?

              Comment

              • GenoMax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2008
                • 7142

                #8
                Since files at EBI have this problem it may be worth a shot getting them using fastq-dump from SRA.

                There are instances where the original data as submitted may have a problem. If the files from SRA don't work either then you should contact SRA support and/or the original submitter to let them know.
                Last edited by GenoMax; 01-21-2016, 04:57 AM.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                33 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                23 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                41 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                45 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...