Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sjuzhet
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 9

    Calling indels against a very small reference sequence?

    Hi y'all,

    So I'm trying to detect a CRISPR-induced indel in a specific region of the genome, so I only sequenced that particular region and I was planning on using that specific region as a reference sequence, rather than the whole genome. However, most workflows I've researched involved calling indels against large genomes - which is probably gross overkill for my application.

    Does anyone have any thoughts on what would be the best way to detect what percentage of my reads contain an indel within a 500-bp region?
  • HESmith
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 512

    #2
    It would be easier to provide suggestions if you described 1) how you selected the region of interest (amplicon? oligo capture?) and 2) the sequencing platform and type of data you generated (Sanger? Illumina PE-250?).

    Comment

    • sjuzhet
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 9

      #3
      They're PCR amplicons, yes, and sequenced on a MiSeq. Several different cutting conditions were multiplexed, and I was hoping to compare them all against the reference sequence.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Try BBMap and align to the region of interest (you will need to make BBMap index). Using appropriate maxindel= (and any additional parameters that make sense).

        Comment

        • HESmith
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 512

          #5
          Or, assuming the paired-end reads overlap, you could use BBMerge (part of BBMap) and filter by sequence length. Any merged reads that are shorter than the predicted amplicon length contain deletions.

          But BBMap alignment is fairly quick and easy to use, so that's a valid option.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...