Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • danova
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 27

    bbduk for mirna mapping

    Hi,
    I have run a miseq run for microrna detection, filtered the data (removed adaptors and ncRNAs (others than microRNAs) and i´m now going to identify reads mapping to microRNAs in Human.

    As for the strategy not sure if i have to map to the human genome or i can directly map to the mature.fa database from mirbase. Any suggestion ? The reason i have choosen not to map to the human genome is that not really interested in denovo microRNAS but on the contrary i´m not sure if i have first to remove reads that can map to other parts of the genome.

    So far i have decided to align to mature mirbase database.

    I´m using the following command:

    bbduk.sh ref=mature.fa.gz in=1.fa.gz stats=statsmature.txt out=mirna.fa hdist=0


    1/ What is the best approach to identify full match microRNAs (no mismatch) with bbduk.
    2/ How to identify isomirs ? Do i need to cluster reads first with vsearch with a 99% identity and then map to mirbase with 100% full match.

    Thanks for your comments
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    By default BBDuk will allow one mismatch of the middle base in a kmer (even with "hdist=0"). You need to add the flag "mm=f" to require exact matches. mm stands for "maskmiddle".

    If you want to require every kmer in a sequence to also be present in the reference, you can also add "mkf=1" (which stands for min kmer fraction). That will make the process completely intolerant of any errors or remaining adapter sequence, though.

    Be sure to specify a kmer length. If you are looking for RNAs as short as 17bp, then set "k=17"; the default is much longer.

    So, the full command might look like:

    Code:
    bbduk.sh ref=mature.fa.gz in=1.fa.gz stats=statsmature.txt out=mirna.fa hdist=0 [B]mm=f mkf=1 k=17[/B]
    ...but you should determine for yourself what value you want for K.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...