Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dickie_ho
    Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 27

    #1

    CNVnator false positives -- Struggling

    Hey everyone

    I am having a hard time dealing with CNVnator .. well the results it generates..
    I have array data, exome-seq data which the CNV calls line up .... Now using WGS data and I am getting loads of calls (10,000s) from CNVnator but where I know there are CNVs (confirmed by taqman) I am not getting that called in CNVnator ...

    My Pipe for WGS is bowtie2 -> Picard Mark dups -> GATK (base score and INDEL)

    Appreciate any help as I have been stuck on this for weeks

    Cheers

    Josh
  • Markiyan
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 126

    #2
    Did you use PCR-Free library preps?

    Dear Dickie_ho,

    So, which library prep technique did you (or your provider) use for wgs sample prep?
    Nextera Shotgun, Truseq or PCR-Free?

    For most reliable results we recommend using the PCR free one and aim for 350bp average fragment size (longer fragments are more prone to the CG bias in the clustering stage), and avoid the nextera with default cycling conditions on the fast ramping thermocycles.
    The nextera's cycle denaturation times of 10-15sec are a bit to short, better use 30sec @96 or similar (PCR-free is still the best, esp @ high AT regions).

    Otherwice I would not hope for much accuracy from the CNV detection based on the reads coverage.

    Look on the reads coverge plots for the region where there is no CNV and the control ones, and get a feel for the SNR (signa to noise ratio).

    PS: Lucigen recenly released a kit which is supposed to give you a PCR-free library with only 75ng of good quality input DNA (versus 1ug for illumina PCR-Free).

    Markiyan.

    Comment

    • dickie_ho
      Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 27

      #3
      Hey Markiyan

      Thank you for your reply

      The TruSeq PCR-free preps were used

      Will check out the SNR.. thank you for this suggestion.. I will have a look and see if I can some how determine the best calls.. if not back to the drawing board

      ####PS: Lucigen recenly released a kit which is supposed to give you a PCR-free library with only 75ng of good quality input DNA (versus 1ug for illumina PCR-Free).

      Cheers for that info ..

      Thanks

      Josh

      Comment

      • Markiyan
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2010
        • 126

        #4
        Also make sure the reads mapping to multiple regions are handled properly.

        Dear Josh,

        Last 5 cents:
        Please also make sure the reads mapping to multiple locations are handled properly by the bowtie2. Maybe raise kmer length vallue to 25-31?
        I would suggest mapping them randomly, do not just throw them out!
        See CNVNator manual/guides for more info.

        Optimal parameters would deppend on read length, read error rate and genome size/repetitiveness.

        Markiyan.

        Comment

        • dickie_ho
          Member
          • Mar 2013
          • 27

          #5


          Found out from the sequencing centre that its was the nano not the PCR-free kit .....

          Thank you for all your help Markiyan.. I would have spent a few more weeks trying to work this out if its wasn't for your help ....

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2




            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
            Today, 06:46 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          68 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          48 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...