Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • repinementer
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 80

    Empty cuffdiff files

    Dear cufflinks users

    I used cuffdiff command on one sample (gtf file) against 10 samples (sam files)
    Though I got nice results of gene_exp.diff and isoform_exp.diff and genes.fpkm_tracking and isoform.fpkm_tracking I could n't able to get any kind of results in cds.diff, cds_exp.diff, promoters.diff, splicing.diff and tss_group, exp.diff.

    Does any one know wy? Do we need to use any special options to point those?

    I just ran the command in the manual

    Code:
    cuffdiff   file.gtf   f1.sam f2.sam f3.sam .......f10.sam

    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 0_1_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 0_1_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1239587 Aug 16 17:40 0_1_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1269381 Aug 16 17:40 0_1_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 0_1_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 0_1_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 0_1_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 1_2_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 1_2_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1244129 Aug 16 17:40 1_2_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1273834 Aug 16 17:40 1_2_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 1_2_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 1_2_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 1_2_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 2_3_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 2_3_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1230406 Aug 16 17:40 2_3_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1259932 Aug 16 17:40 2_3_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 2_3_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 2_3_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 2_3_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 3_4_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 3_4_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1241031 Aug 16 17:40 3_4_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1270585 Aug 16 17:40 3_4_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 3_4_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 3_4_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 3_4_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 4_5_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 4_5_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1220536 Aug 16 17:40 4_5_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1250224 Aug 16 17:40 4_5_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 4_5_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 4_5_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 4_5_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 5_6_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 5_6_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1219221 Aug 16 17:40 5_6_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1248906 Aug 16 17:40 5_6_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 5_6_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 5_6_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 5_6_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 6_7_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 6_7_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1234666 Aug 16 17:40 6_7_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1264268 Aug 16 17:40 6_7_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 6_7_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 6_7_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 6_7_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 7_8_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 7_8_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1240311 Aug 16 17:40 7_8_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1269932 Aug 16 17:40 7_8_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 7_8_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 7_8_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 7_8_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 8_9_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 8_9_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1208285 Aug 16 17:40 8_9_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1237988 Aug 16 17:40 8_9_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 8_9_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 8_9_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 8_9_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 9_10_cds.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 9_10_cds_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1220632 Aug 16 17:40 9_10_gene_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1250339 Aug 16 17:40 9_10_isoform_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 9_10_promoters.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 81 Aug 16 17:40 9_10_splicing.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 89 Aug 16 17:40 9_10_tss_group_exp.diff
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 2261734908 Aug 11 06:54 accepted_hits.sam
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 67 Aug 16 17:40 cds.fpkm_tracking
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 327377694 Aug 11 06:56 coverage.wig
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 20100437 Aug 15 16:58 genes.expr
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 4572834 Aug 16 17:40 genes.fpkm_tracking
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 4604190 Aug 16 17:40 isoforms.fpkm_tracking
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 17148568 Aug 11 06:47 junctions.bed
    drwxrwxr-x 2 user user 4096 Aug 11 06:40 logs
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 25367498 Aug 15 16:58 transcripts.expr
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 135915768 Aug 15 16:58 transcripts.gtf
    -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 67 Aug 16 17:40 tss_groups.fpkm_tracking
  • Balat
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 36

    #2
    I think you may have to run cuffcompare with gtf file from each of your 10 samples. Then run cuffdiff with stdout.combined.gtf file obtained from cuffcompare. Did you use a reference annotation? According to the manual, you will get cds.diff, cds_exp.diff files only if you use reference annotation.
    I am not sure if this will help but am interested to know the results after you run cuffcompare.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    21 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...