Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mlloyd
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2015
    • 1

    #1

    Question about how to interpret DEXSeq data with a multi-factor experimental design

    I have successfully run DEXSeq (version 1.16.7) in R version 3.2.3. I believe the analysis ran smoothly without any problems but I am having trouble interpreting the results.

    I have a multi-factor experimental design:
    Day 1/Low CO2
    Day 1/High CO2
    Day 7/Low CO2
    Day 7/High CO2

    I checked for the effect of CO2 with the following formulas:
    ~ sample + exon
    vs.
    ~ sample + exon + CO2:exon
    This resulted in 134149 insignificant hits and 3 significant hits

    I then checked for the effect of CO2 when accounting for Day with the following:
    reduced model = ~ sample + exon + Day:exon
    full model = ~ sample + exon + Day:exon + condition:exon
    This resulted in the same results as above

    I then did 4 separate tests subsetting the data:
    Effect of Day in only low CO2 data: 4,821 significant hits
    Effect of Day in only high CO2 data: 4,258 significant hits
    Effect of CO2 only in Day 1: no significant hits
    Effect of CO2 only in Day 7: no significant hits

    The large effect of Day is expected because we were sequencing early embryos that were developing very quickly. However, you can see the number of significant exons is not the same in the two tests for the effect of Day. Furthermore, when I compare the lists of the 4,821 significant hits to the list of the 4,258 significant hits, I find a lot of hits unique to each test.

    This leads me to believe there might be an interaction between CO2 and Day but I cannot figure out how to test for it. My question is: How do I test for the interacting effect between two factors in DEXSeq?

    Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...