Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mlloyd
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2015
    • 1

    Question about how to interpret DEXSeq data with a multi-factor experimental design

    I have successfully run DEXSeq (version 1.16.7) in R version 3.2.3. I believe the analysis ran smoothly without any problems but I am having trouble interpreting the results.

    I have a multi-factor experimental design:
    Day 1/Low CO2
    Day 1/High CO2
    Day 7/Low CO2
    Day 7/High CO2

    I checked for the effect of CO2 with the following formulas:
    ~ sample + exon
    vs.
    ~ sample + exon + CO2:exon
    This resulted in 134149 insignificant hits and 3 significant hits

    I then checked for the effect of CO2 when accounting for Day with the following:
    reduced model = ~ sample + exon + Day:exon
    full model = ~ sample + exon + Day:exon + condition:exon
    This resulted in the same results as above

    I then did 4 separate tests subsetting the data:
    Effect of Day in only low CO2 data: 4,821 significant hits
    Effect of Day in only high CO2 data: 4,258 significant hits
    Effect of CO2 only in Day 1: no significant hits
    Effect of CO2 only in Day 7: no significant hits

    The large effect of Day is expected because we were sequencing early embryos that were developing very quickly. However, you can see the number of significant exons is not the same in the two tests for the effect of Day. Furthermore, when I compare the lists of the 4,821 significant hits to the list of the 4,258 significant hits, I find a lot of hits unique to each test.

    This leads me to believe there might be an interaction between CO2 and Day but I cannot figure out how to test for it. My question is: How do I test for the interacting effect between two factors in DEXSeq?

    Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
39 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
102 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
123 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
0 responses
114 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...