Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jerrybug109
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 10

    #1

    help needed: reference guided assembly of bacterial genomes?

    Hi all! Bioinfo newbie here!

    We recently used a core facility to sequence the genomes of 40 strains of one species of bacteria (150bp short reads, paired end, illumina) and now I'm trying to figure out the best approach to assemble their genomes.

    There are reference genomes out there for this species so I assume that a reference guided assembly would be the best way to go.

    I'm trying to decide which genome assembly software would be best to assemble bacterial genomes (with a reference). It seems like several of the "big" ones out there like spADES or Velvet are good at de novo assembly.

    What's the difference between genome assembly and alignment/mapping? Why can't I use an alignment like Bowtie to do reference guided assembly? It seems to me that reference-guided assembly and alignment would do the same thing?

    Would love your insight, thanks.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    SPAdes (or some would recommend velvet). If you have enough coverage (and the data is good quality) start there. If you don't get good results then you could start looking at other options.

    If you have a good reference you could just align and see what that gets you.

    I also would recommend that you look at Mauve for genome wide comparisons.

    Comment

    • jerrybug109
      Member
      • Oct 2015
      • 10

      #3
      Thanks!

      Someone has also suggested to me that I could de novo assemble all 40 strains and then map those contigs onto a reference genome afterwards?

      Is this sort of "hybrid" approach preferable over just trying to do an alignment? It seems like there's numerous approaches out there but I'm not well versed enough to gauge general consensus yet.

      Our later downstream goal with the assembled genomes is to look for genetic variation between the strains.

      Thanks!

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Are your genomes true strains of the reference (i.e. you expect them to align with high % identity across the entire genome)?

        In your case you can probably tackle the ultimate goal of SNP calls from more than one end but if the answer to the question above is yes the doing alignments to reference followed by SNP calls may be the most straightforward way. If you start seeing gaps/unaligned reads then that could give you an idea of how much the strains vary from the reference. At that point individual assemblies can be tried for a more complete picture. Followed by Mauve analysis.

        Comment

        • jerrybug109
          Member
          • Oct 2015
          • 10

          #5
          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          Are your genomes true strains of the reference (i.e. you expect them to align with high % identity across the entire genome)?

          In your case you can probably tackle the ultimate goal of SNP calls from more than one end but if the answer to the question above is yes the doing alignments to reference followed by SNP calls may be the most straightforward way. If you start seeing gaps/unaligned reads then that could give you an idea of how much the strains vary from the reference. At that point individual assemblies can be tried for a more complete picture. Followed by Mauve analysis.
          Our genomes are individual strains of bacillus subtilis and the reference genome is bacillus subtilis, so I think my answer to your question is yes.

          Thanks.

          Since the genomes are only ~4.2 megabases long it seems like it would take a fairly trivial amount of running time to assemble them using spADES or velvet/velvetoptimiser. Maybe we'll go ahead and just do the individual assemblies anyway. I'll try it out a couple ways!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...