Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aew
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 1

    VCF NC Format

    Hi,

    I ran VARSCAN2 mpileup2snp to call SNPs and generated a vcf file.

    However, I noticed a strange thing about the NC flag. This is apparently INFO=<id=nc,number=1,type=integer,description="number of="" samples="" not="" called"="">

    However, I see

    Code:
    TR43100|c0_g1_i1    792 .   T   C   .   PASS    ADP=0;WT=1;HET=0;HOM=1;NC=17    GT:GQ:SDP:DP:RD:AD:FREQ:PVAL:RBQ:ABQ:RDF:RDR:ADF:ADR    ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:1 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:1 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:1 0/0:10:5:5:5:0:0%:1E0:38:0:0:5:0:0  ./.:.:0 ./.:.:1 ./.:.:1 1/1:7:2:2:0:2:100%:1.6667E-1:0:33:0:0:1:1   ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0
    This has NC=17 and I can see from the 19 samples 2 have been called. This seems correct.

    Code:
    TR43100|c1_g1_i1    351 .   T   C   .   PASS    ADP=0;WT=1;HET=1;HOM=0;NC=17    GT:GQ:SDP:DP:RD:AD:FREQ:PVAL:RBQ:ABQ:RDF:RDR:ADF:ADR    ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:1  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:2  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  0/1:6:4:4:2:2:50%:2.1429E-1:40:38:2:0:1:1   ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0  ./:.:0
    This has NC=17 abut I can only see one sample that has been called? What have I missed, why isn't NC=18 here?

    And it says WT=1. Where is the WT? This should be 0/0

    And also
    Code:
    TR43100|c0_g1_i1 763 . G A . PASS ADP=0;WT=2;HET=0;HOM=1;NC=16 GT:GQ:SDP:DP:RD:AD:FREQ:PVAL:RBQ:ABQ:RDF:RDR:ADF:ADR ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 1/1:13:3:3:0:3:100%:5E-2:0:39:0:0:0:3 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:1 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:1 0/0:6:3:3:3:0:0%:1E0:40:0:0:3:0:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:1 ./.:.:1 ./.:.:2 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0 ./.:.:0
    Where are the 2 WT? I can only see 1 0/0
    Last edited by GenoMax; 03-07-2016, 08:12 AM. Reason: added CODE tags to improve readability
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For reference/cross-posted: https://www.biostars.org/p/180308/

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    21 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...