Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bvk
    Member
    • May 2015
    • 65

    FoldChange calculation for two samples

    Hi all,

    I have two RNA-Seq samples. Detecting differential expressed genes for two samples is not possible. So, I want to calculate fold change for Sample1 vs Sample2.

    Based on that I want to detect differential expressed genes.

    Each sample has the following information.

    tracking_id, class_code, nearest_ref_id, gene_id, gene_short_name, tss_id, locus length, coverage, FPKM, FPKM_conf_lo, FPKM_conf_hi, FPKM_status

    Is there any R package to calculate FC for two smaples?
  • SamCurt
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 40

    #2
    I don't understand what you mean here. While you understand "detecting differential expressed genes for two samples is not possible" without biological replicates, how do you "based on [fold change] ... detect differential expressed genes"?

    With that kind of data the best I can do is FPKM1/FPKM2, and that's it.

    Comment

    • fahmida
      Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 54

      #3
      Agree with SamCurt. You can quantify the expression level of genes for two samples, however, you do not have any statistical power to reliably estimate the differential expression.

      Comment

      • Michael.Ante
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 127

        #4
        I also have to agree. You can have a look at GFOLD. It is not calling a test for differential expression but rather computes a "more reliable" fold-change.

        For further experiments I'd suggest to plan the design in order to satisfy the statistical requirements.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...