Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pparg
    Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 19

    #1

    Problem with NCBI gene location annotations

    I recently downloaded multiple versions of human gene location annotation for different genome builds from NCBI MapView ftp site:

    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/MapVi...seq_gene.md.gz
    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/MapVi...seq_gene.md.gz
    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/MapVi...seq_gene.md.gz
    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/MapVi...seq_gene.md.gz

    Below is the overall statistics on the number of genes from each build based on these data.
    Build\Counts total unique
    37.3 36500 36451
    36.3 96694 35171
    35.1 46159 27281
    34.3 28401 27455

    I notice that the file for Build.36.3 have much more replicate gene entries than all other builds. In fact, each gene has about 3 different locations in Build.36.3. It looks like that a gene with multiple locations usually suggest that gene aligns across a gap in the reference genome assembly or misassembly of the reference. For example: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6011.
    If this is true, then Build.36.3 is a reference genome with at least tens of thousands of misassembly, much more errors than all other assemblies. It sound unbelievable given this build.36.3 (or hg18) used to be so widely used. Any hint on what’s the problem? Thanks!
  • Richard Finney
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 701

    #2
    There are seperate "assemblies" in each file ...
    cut -f13 g36 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
    1 group_label
    6 c22_H2
    24 DR53
    548 c5_H2
    3026 c6_QBL
    3242 c6_COX
    21405 CRA_TCAGchr7v2
    399153 HuRef
    400357 Celera
    420864 reference

    I recommend using "reference".

    See here : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/g...ase_notes.html

    Comment

    • pparg
      Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 19

      #3
      Richard, that really helps. Thank you!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...