Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ClemBuntu
    Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 37

    #1

    What does DV format mean in a VCF file ?

    Hello everyone,

    I got a VCF file with the following line :

    ##FORMAT=<ID=DV,Number=1,Type=Integer,Description="Number of high-quality non-reference bases">
    My question is pretty simple but I didn't find any answer : what is a "high quality" ? How can I know which threshold was used ?

    I've used samtools mpileup and then bcftools call with -m option.
  • gringer
    David Eccles (gringer)
    • May 2011
    • 845

    #2
    The '-Q' option of samtools mpileup sets the quality threshold for bases; by default any base with a quality of less than 13 is ignored.

    Comment

    • ClemBuntu
      Member
      • Dec 2014
      • 37

      #3
      The SNP is not filtered out because I obtain it in my VCF file.
      For example I can have a SNP with a DP equal to 40 but the DV will be 4,3 and 5 for my 3 samples.

      So I dunno what does that mean...

      Comment

      • gringer
        David Eccles (gringer)
        • May 2011
        • 845

        #4
        The '-Q' option of mpileup refers to individual bases, not entire reads, or SNPs inferred from reads. Quality can vary over the length of a read, so this statistic only counts portions of reads that are high quality.

        Comment

        • HESmith
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 512

          #5
          Originally posted by ClemBuntu View Post
          The SNP is not filtered out because I obtain it in my VCF file.
          For example I can have a SNP with a DP equal to 40 but the DV will be 4,3 and 5 for my 3 samples.

          So I dunno what does that mean...
          DP is the total number of reads that cover the SNP position; of those, four contained the SNP (e.g., G when the reference is T) for sample A, three for sample B, and five for sample C. The remaining reads typically match the reference base (T), although it's possible that they contain non-SNP/non-reference calls (A or C).

          Comment

          • ClemBuntu
            Member
            • Dec 2014
            • 37

            #6
            Originally posted by HESmith View Post
            DP is the total number of reads that cover the SNP position; of those, four contained the SNP (e.g., G when the reference is T) for sample A, three for sample B, and five for sample C. The remaining reads typically match the reference base (T), although it's possible that they contain non-SNP/non-reference calls (A or C).
            Then why the DV description is "Number of high-quality non-reference bases" and not "Number of non-reference bases" ?

            Plus you're talking about the DP which is in INFO :
            ##INFO=<ID=DP,Number=1,Type=Integer,Description="Raw read depth">

            But if you look at the DP which is in format :
            ##FORMAT=<ID=DP,Number=1,Type=Integer,Description="Number of high-quality bases">

            I could also ask what's the difference between DP and DP4 :

            ##INFO=<ID=DP4,Number=4,Type=Integer,Description="Number of high-quality ref-forward , ref-reverse, alt-forward and alt-reverse bases">

            Comment

            • gringer
              David Eccles (gringer)
              • May 2011
              • 845

              #7
              Then why the DV description is "Number of high-quality non-reference bases" and not "Number of non-reference bases" ?
              Because it's usually only the high-quality bases that should be looked at when identifying variants.

              I could also ask what's the difference between DP and DP4
              DP4 gives another way of identifying poorly-covered regions. Variants should have roughly equal numbers of forward and reverse reads (assuming a sample prep that is not strand-specific). An imbalance in this may indicate that something funny is going on with sequences that span the region.

              Comment

              • ClemBuntu
                Member
                • Dec 2014
                • 37

                #8
                Originally posted by gringer View Post
                Because it's usually only the high-quality bases that should be looked at when identifying variants.
                I agree, and according to your previous post "high quality" means above "-Q" option used with mpileup right (ie 13 by default) ?

                Comment

                • gringer
                  David Eccles (gringer)
                  • May 2011
                  • 845

                  #9
                  I expect so. Modifying the '-Q' option changes how many bases are shown in the mpileup output, and I would expect that those are the only bases that make it through for the variant calculations.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    How Immunogenomics Decodes Immunity’s Genetic Blueprint
                    by SEQadmin2




                    The immune system’s power comes from its genetic diversity, allowing myriad threats to be neutralized through first recognizing foreign antigens. That diversity is also what makes the immune system so difficult to study. Recent advances in sequencing technology and computational biology, however, are giving researchers new tools to understand immune responses and immune-related diseases in greater detail.

                    This convergence of genetics, immunology, and computation...
                    Today, 05:41 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                    by SEQadmin2



                    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                    ...
                    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
                  0 responses
                  42 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
                  0 responses
                  48 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
                  0 responses
                  55 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
                  0 responses
                  50 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...