Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ronaldrcutler
    Member
    • May 2016
    • 80

    #1

    Gene Name nomenclature

    Hello all. I have a set of DE genes from a single replicate as identified by the GFOLD package. Though I am getting results which have the same gene ID but different suffixes at the end of the name and different GFOLD levels. I used a .bed file for the annotation. Usually I use a .gff3 file with HTSeq-count.


    It looks like this:

    Code:
    #GeneSymbol	                                                             GeneName  GFOLD(0.005)
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1	 NA	-4.50996
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds1	 NA	-3.62531
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds2	 NA	-2.81447
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds3	 NA	-3.38619
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds4	 NA	-2.05015
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds5	 NA	-1.9145
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds6	 NA	-2.44262
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds7	 NA	-3.6937
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds8	 NA	-1.33762
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.cds9	 NA	-3.64182
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+.mrna1.exon1 NA	-3.62531
    Can anybody clarify to me the differences between these Gene Symbols? I am used to Gene names looking something like this:

    Code:
    42SP43|c.Taira201203kidney_X008044|JGIv7b.000075417_5391788-5397899+__chr9_10L
    42SP50|c.XenBase_133737005|JGIv7b.000220448_3999398-4005758+__chr6L
    A1CF|c.Taira201203intestine_X005935|JGIv7b.000079772_4581973-4609884+__chr7L
    Thanks

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...