Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ron128
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 38

    #1

    read trimming for small RNA NGS data

    Hello all. This seems to be a routinely discussed question with many answers around here, however I could not use the answers provided in other questions to solve my query. I have some mi-RNA seq data from Illumina Hiseq platform. Thats about all the information I have with me. I have not been able to identify the vendor who has done the sequencing, so approaching them is out of question. My problem is as follows : I have single end sequencing reads of 54 base length. I am trying to identify a good way to trim them. I have no idea what adapter to use for read trimming, so I have been stupidly looking a t other posts on here trying to make sense. Long story short, as suggested on some posts, my FastQc over represented sequence output gives me these two sequences as the adapter sequences in one sample :

    AGCCGCCTGGATACCGCAGCTAGGAATAATGGAATTCTCGGGTGCCAAGG 189653 0.410031497 Illumina Small RNA Adapter 2 (100% over 21bp) CGCGACCTCAGATCAGACGTGGCGACCCGTGGAATTCTCGGGTGCCAAGG 184505 0.398901475 Illumina Small RNA Adapter 2 (100% over 21bp)

    and these 3 sequences as the adapter in a different sample.

    AGCCGCCTGGATACCGCAGCTAGGAATAATGGAATTCTCGGGTGCCAAGG 189653 0.410031497 Illumina Small RNA Adapter 2 (100% over 21bp) CGCGACCTCAGATCAGACGTGGCGACCCGTGGAATTCTCGGGTGCCAAGG 184505 0.398901475 Illumina Small RNA Adapter 2 (100% over 21bp) TTGCTGTGATGACTATCTTAGGACACCTTTGGAATTCTCGGGTGCCAAGG 50032 0.108169635 Illumina Small RNA Adapter 2 (100% over 21bp)

    Now these are two different samples run in different lanes. I do not know if sequencing was pooled with an indexing adapter (although that is very likely given the total number of reads being small.) after matching over the four sequences I have deduced that TGGAATTCTCGGGTGCCAAGG is my illumina adapter sequence. The problem is I cannot find any mention of this being a adapter sequence in any of illumina's official documents on their FTP, other than this document http://support.illumina.com/content/...15061994-a.pdf. Is this the correct sequence?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For reference cross-posted at: https://www.biostars.org/p/201479/

    It is ok to cross-post here.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...