Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mountainogre
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 5

    #1

    Recognition of Fastq format

    Hi there,
    We are re-analyzing several Solexa Fastq files generated during the past couple of years. They were not all created on the same version of the Illumina Genome Analyzer pipeline. Does anyone know of a straightforward (and perhaps automatic?) way to recognize the precise fastq format so we can analyze these data appropriately?
    Many thanks.
  • svl
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 43

    #2
    The format of the fastq files should be equal, I guess..? Do you mean the different quality value encoding? If so, here is a description:


    You can use several converters, listed a bit lower on the page.

    Comment

    • maubp
      Peter (Biopython etc)
      • Jul 2009
      • 1544

      #3
      You have to look at the range of ASCII quality scores present, and this will allow you to exclude some of the formatting variants.

      For example, since the Solexa scores can be negative you can get ASCII values from to 59 (Solexa -5) to 63 (Solexa -1), while PHRED scores must be zero or more (thus ASCI 64 or higher for Illumina 1.3+ FASTQ).

      However, if you have only ASCII values of 64 or higher, you can't be 100% sure of the version - but it won't make that much difference since Solexa and PHRED scores are equal above quality ten (after rounding).

      You should also be able to spot very recent Illumina 1.5+ FASTQ files by the funny quality distribution. They use 'B' (PHRED 2) as a special marker, an apparently don't use PHRED 0, 1, or 3 anymore. See:

      Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

      Comment

      • fkrueger
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 627

        #4
        A very quick and easy way is to run everything through fastqc, it will mention at the top which kind of fastQ format you are looking at.

        Comment

        • mountainogre
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 5

          #5
          Thanks for all the helpful suggestions.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...