Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nucacidhunter
    replied
    I know that there are some open source software that gives the number and size of the in silico digest fragments. Hopefully someone in the forum can give the names. I found the following thesis interesting in this regard:

    Leave a comment:


  • AP38
    replied
    Thanks nucacidhunter,

    You are right about the calculation method. It is not the best because of the point you made but should still give a rough estimate. The empirical method is definitely the most accurate way but I would prefer to have a precise in silico estimate prior to jumping into lab work.

    Would you have a good bioinformatic method to propose?

    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • nucacidhunter
    replied
    Calculation method that you have described is incorrect because it assumes that nucleotide sequences in genomes are random and ignores the repetitive content. Two correct methods:

    1- Bioinformatically if there is a reference as you have mentioned
    2- Empirical (most accurate)

    Leave a comment:


  • AP38
    started a topic Estimating the number of ddRAD fragments

    Estimating the number of ddRAD fragments

    Hi all,

    I am wondering if there is an easy way to estimate the number of fragments resulting from a double digest reaction (in my case ddRAD). For a single digest, one can do the following:

    ((proportion of cut sites)^(enzyme cut frequency)) x (genome size) = number of RAD fragments

    For instance, with ecoRI (6 cutter) and a proportion of 0.25 across a genome of 2.5Gbs:

    (0.25)^6 x 2,500,000,000 = 610,351.6 RAD fragments


    Is there a similar way for calculate this for a double digest reaction? One could use simRAD in R or even use grep or cat commands on the reference fasta file (cat ref.fasta | tr -d "\n" | grep -o -E “enz1sequence.{200,400}enzyme2sequence” | wc -l).

    However, I would like to know if there is an easier solution to this such as the one described above for single digest.

    Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
75 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...