Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gen2prot
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 68

    Genome repeat masking before gene annotation

    Hello All,

    I wanted to know whether repeatmasking a genome or genome fragment, before performing gene annotation, is a good idea. The literature (http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v1...l/nrg3174.html, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...eva.12178/full) and software such as MAKER, and PASA advocate repeatmasking before annotation of genes. While this seems like a logical thing to do, I am wondering about the following questions and looking for answers

    1) If a non-repeat related gene contains a repetitive region (lets say part of the gag-pol domain is present in a gene, or some exon contains a satellite repeat), does a masking software like repeatmasker mask these regions.

    2) How many cases like the above actually exist in all types of reference genomes. and what is its impact on gene calling/annotation

    3) For genome reference guided transcriptome assembly purposes is it recommended that a masked genome be used? I agree that for expression quantification, this may lead to overestimation or under representation in some cases.

    Thank you in advance. Your answers will help me design a better annotation pipeline for my clients.

    -Abhijit

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
53 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...