Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • peerah
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2015
    • 6

    #1

    Discrepancy in plasmid and transposons copy number estimation using WGS vs qPCR

    We are trying to estimate plasmid copy number in a bacterium by mapping Illumina reads on corrected PacBio contigs and comparing read coverage between the chromosomal and plasmid contigs. Chromosome is about 5 Mbp and plasmid is 190 kbp.

    The depth was good for both contigs (200-1000 reads). The ratio between chromosomal vs plasmid was about 1:2. The coverage of a transposon in the plasmid was even higher (1:4 comparing to chromosomal). I tried to confirm this using qPCR by comparing PCR efficiency-adjusted Ct (not the typical ddCT that assumes all efficiency = 2) between two reference single-copy chromosomal genes (rpoB, gyrA) and three target genes on the plasmid (two inside a transposon and one outside), and everything came down to a tight and solid 1:1. It is not uncommon for a plasmid like this to be single copy. I was wondering if the sequencing depth could be used in this manner without any bias adjustment. I am seriously doubting my ability to design a PCR, but I found nothing wrong with it. Should I trust the simple coverage calculation or the PCR at this point?

    The average GC content of chromosome is about 56%. Plasmid GC content is 54%, but the transposon on the plasmid (10 kb) is 62% GC.

    Any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Thank you so much!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...