Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AnotherHTS
    Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 11

    Eland - GRCh37/hg19 assembly

    Hi All,

    I have recently experienced a problem using the human GRCh37/hg19 assembly (from UCSC) with CASAVA/Eland.

    After aligning samples with an expected random coverage to the UCSC GRCh37/hg19 assembly, we noticed large areas with zero read coverage. For example no hits were found between positions 1 and
    151000000 on chr1.

    The fix to this was to place all of the random and unplaced contigs from the assembly into one file before squashing the genome. After we had reduced the number of reference files our alignment ran as expected, and produced the whole genome coverage we expected to see. I was wondering if anyone else has experienced anything similar?
  • mgogol
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 197

    #2
    I just did a run against hg19, but I haven't looked at the data yet.

    According to an illumina guy at a user group meeting, you should leave out the haplotype chromosomes when squashing the human genome, otherwise a number of reads will be thrown out for multi-mapping. Also, the genome's too big for squashing if you include them.

    Comment

    • mgogol
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2008
      • 197

      #3
      Just an update: Yes, we did see something similar. Ugh.

      Re-aligning with a genome directly from Illumina that doesn't include the random and unplaced stuff. I really wish eland squash genomes would give you an error when it fails.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...