Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lre1234
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 110

    Data Analysis question

    Hi all,
    I'm going through some exome-seq data (10 samples), and following a "standard" pipeline - BWA, HaplotypeCaller, GenotypeGVCF, etc.. nothing too fancy.

    My question is on the VQSR step. From my understanding, this works best when you have lots of samples to look at, but since I only have 10 samples, would it be better to simply do some hard-filtering on the dataset? Alternatively, I was thinking of bringing in some additional samples (such as a bunch of 1K genome exomes) and add these into the mix. This would increase the number of samples. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Also, how many samples would be truly need to do the variant filtering with the VQSR rather than hard-filtering? (I'm having a little bit of a hard time finding what the minimum number of samples for it to work reliably).

    Thanks for any advice
  • vivek_
    PhD Student
    • Jul 2012
    • 164

    #2
    Adding 1000 genomes samples might be counterintuitive because you probably already use them as a training set to build the VQSR classifier. There shouldn't be an issue with using hard filtering but regarding sample size for VQSR, you might ask the developers on the GATK forum to get the right answer.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      Yesterday, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    8 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    31 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    29 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...