Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jpjp
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 7

    #1

    Aligner Question

    Hi guys,

    I am trying to develop an alignment software for paired end reads. But I can't find the values for the insert size and the standard deviation allowed in that value in the fastq file.

    Is there a standard place where these values can be found? Could someone shed light on how other alignment software get these values?

    thanks,

    jp
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    Moved to the bioinformatics forum rather than posting to a thread that was a year old.

    Comment

    • rwenang
      Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 31

      #3
      CMIIW, the insert size depends on the wet-lab sequencing protocol / technology. So, if a bioinformatician were to use a mapping tool, they usually know the insert size in advance, either from the biologist, or from the protocol spec.

      Comment

      • jpjp
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 7

        #4
        thanks for the reply. I just thought if this information was part of the reads file (.fastq), that would be very natural.

        Comment

        • maubp
          Peter (Biopython etc)
          • Jul 2009
          • 1544

          #5
          The paired end insert size information is not in the FASTQ files (unless the sequencing center has a local convention via the read names, read descriptions, or filenames), nor in Roche 454's SFF files. The expected insert size is usually given separately (if you get told at all).

          Comment

          • krobison
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2007
            • 734

            #6
            Many aligners simply infer it from the data; as mentioned above it depends on the protocol AND the actual size distribution may be different from what was expected.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • kinpict.com
              Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by kinpict.com
              The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
              Today, 06:37 PM
            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            2 responses
            56 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post kinpict.com  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            175 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...