Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deniz
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 1

    #1

    BLAST+ creating custom blast database and using blast+ filtering features

    Hi,

    I would like to create a personal blast database of arbitrary sequences and be able to use all the features of BLAST+ to create subsets of databases based on identifiers or filter based on taxonomy.

    It looks like the formatting of the definition line in the input FASTA files is crucial to assign proper sequence identifiers.

    Using the General database identifier gnl|database|identifier or local identifier format lcl|identifier I wasn't able to use the blastdb_aliastool to create db subsets as it expects a GI list as input. I also didn't have any luck assigning taxonomy identifiers with the -taxid_map option of makeblastdb.

    What is the recommended way to format FASTA definition lines in order to be able to use all the filtering features of the BLAST+ tools.

    I was thinking of creating pseudo GenBank definitions for all my sequences: gi|<gi-number>|gb|<AccessionVersion>|<Accession>, where <gi-number> is a generated numeric value, and <Accession/Version> is my identifier. This works for the GI based filtering, however it seems like an ugly hack and I would prefer something more straight forward.

    How is the taxid_map file formatted? I've tried <gi-number>, <gb|<AccessionVersion>>, or <gb|Accession> as the sequence identifier, however they don't seem to be assigned properly and blastdbcmd with -outfmt %T gives me zero for all entries.

    Thanks for any help,

    Deniz

    PS: I've posted this already in http://I.SEQanswers.com but as it's still beta traffic is a bit low and I'm probably more likely to get an answer here in the forum.
  • nupurgupta
    Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 29

    #2
    Hi,
    I was wondering if you found a solution for this? I have been having all kinds of problems creating subset blast databases.
    Thanks

    Comment

    • couttsbr
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 2

      #3
      GI lists are essentially simple to create, if you have experience with bash, perl, or any programming language that you can use to format text, you may be able to automatically pull the GIs from these files and put them into a GI list. A GI list is simply a text file with one number per line, and each number is a GI. There may be some utilities that do this automatically (i.e. FASTA->GI list), though I don't know of them.

      Alternatively, a nice way I've found for creating GI lists based on queries is to query NCBI for the data you want. You can do a search in NCBI, click send to on the top-right corner, and export it as a GI list. This is a nice, easy way of getting a GI list for blast subsets, though it's difficult to automate.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...