Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • casshyr
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 7

    #1

    How to find DE genes using RPKM values?

    Hello,
    I have essentially 2 datasets, each showing the RPKM values for each gene. I want to compare the gene expressions from one set to another, and see which ones are up-regulated or down-regulated significantly comparing to the other.
    I have tried some primitive ways, such as dividing the two by each other and see if that ratio is greater than a fold change threshold..but this yields to me like 10000 genes, which is unlikely.

    Are there any suggestions on how to find differentially expressed genes based on RPKM values?

    btw I don't have access to the mapped reads data, so programs like DEGseq won't work for me. I only have access to the RPKM values

    Thanks!
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #2
    Well, if you get to many genes, you have to make your fold-change threshold stricter. As this is all you have, you cannot do better.

    What would be a good threshold? Obviously one which reflects how much the RPKM value for a gene typically change between two samples from the same experimental condition. Only if you fold change is much stronger, you can assume that the change is due to the change in condition.

    As you don't have replicates, you can only guess what a good threshold is. In other words: No, you cannot get any reasonable results from just two samples.

    Simon

    Comment

    • mgogol
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2008
      • 197

      #3
      Maybe you could use regression and outlier detection to find outliers in the plot of one data set vs. another (the points furthest from the regression line are the genes showing the biggest changes).

      You should probably look at some histograms and set a lower cutoff on the RPKMs you're willing to consider if you use fold change, because using fold change with really small RPKM values will be very noisy.

      Once you have a ranked list of genes by RPKM fold-change, you could test using qPCR to verify your results.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...