Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bioinfotechs
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 1

    Samtools version 1.3.1 merge function, merging two bam, doesnt contain all the info.

    Hey all,
    I have read many suggestions about merging two or multiple BAM files using samtools merge function. I have also read in the documentation how it works. However, none of the solutions or suggestions seem to work in my case.
    From the beginning, I had reads which I align using SMALT and NextGenMap (individually), obtain the alignment in SAM, convert to BAM, sort and do other calculation. I was using these BAMs to generate consensus sequence using mpileup to be used in my annotation pipeline.
    Now, I want to merge BAMs from two alignment methods namely SMALT and NextGenMap, and use this merged BAM to generate consensus sequence to be used in my annotation pipeline. I want to do so because I believe that there will be many reads aligning to reference at the same configuration in common and that it will also make my further predictions more accurate. While I use samtools merge, on my sorted bam files, it generates a BAM file which does seem to satisfy the statistics but after generating consensus sequence from this bam, there are about only 8-10% of the contigs in this new consensus sequence file as compared to consensus sequence files generated by BAMs of SMALT and NextGenMap. This seems to miss out on many predicted results I obtain individually.
    Anyone has any idea what I can do in such situation or may be in dept of how samtools merge actually puts everything together. Many thanks!!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...