Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • albreaks
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 3

    Mothur Classify OTU Problems

    Hello,

    I keep coming across an issue at the classify OTU step.

    The label is set at 0.03 to determine a 97% similarity between OTUS.
    After I run the command mothur output says "Your file does not include the label 0.03. I will find the next smallest label 0.16"
    This set alls of my data to 84% similarity.

    Has anyone experienced this issue before?
    Do you know why the label would not work?
    Does it have to do with the SILVA file folder I have to use for the taxonomy?

    Any responses are helpful.
    Thanks!

    Ashlee
    Last edited by albreaks; 03-13-2017, 07:15 AM.
  • thermophile
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 243

    #2
    Without knowing anything about your samples or commands run, it's not possible to help. The mothur forum is pretty active, I suggest looking through that and potentially posting there if you can't find an answer.
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

    Comment

    • jpummil
      Member
      • Apr 2014
      • 85

      #3
      Ashlee,

      Can you post the command that specifies 0.03?

      I wonder if the 0.03 requires a unique processing step back a few more commands to appropriately set your data correctly for the 0.03 you mention to work?

      Comment

      • albreaks
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2017
        • 3

        #4
        The command is as follows:
        classify.otu(list=rumenAB.trim.contigs.good.unique.good.filter.unique.precluster.pick.pick.opti_mcc.unique_list.list, count=rumenAB.trim.contigs.good.unique.good.filter.unique.precluster.denovo.uchime.pick.pick.count_table, taxonomy=rumenAB.trim.contigs.good.unique.good.filter.unique.precluster.pick.rdp.wang.pick.taxonomy, label=0.03)

        Comment

        • thermophile
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2015
          • 243

          #5
          go to the mothur forum and explain in more detail what your samples are, sequenced region, etc along with all commands

          Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

          Comment

          • albreaks
            Junior Member
            • Mar 2017
            • 3

            #6
            Thank you for the help!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...