Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JornBR
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 2

    Assembly

    HI Im new in NGS and I have a maybe silly question, I sequenced two isolates of my bacteria of interest and the genome of the reference strain is complete and available. I wonder if it is best to assemble against the reference genome or make a de novo assembly so I don't lose information that maybe is not present in the reference.

    Hope someone can help me to take the right option.
  • mastal
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 666

    #2
    If there is a reference genome available, then you can do a reference guided assembly in the first instance.

    Bacterial genomes are not very large, so shouldn't require too much in the way of computational resources, so you can try both methods and compare the results.

    Comment

    • Brian Bushnell
      Super Moderator
      • Jan 2014
      • 2709

      #3
      I would encourage you to do a completely de novo assembly. As mastal said, you can easily do this both ways and compare results. But, a purely de novo assembly has less risk of mistakes due to differences from the reference. You can obviously gain more continuity with a reference-guided approach, but you will incur misassemblies, so I don't think it's a good idea.

      Comment

      • gringer
        David Eccles (gringer)
        • May 2011
        • 845

        #4
        What platform did you do the bacterial sequencing on? Why do you need to assemble at all (rather than just looking for variants that differ from the reference)?

        If a full-length assembly is absolutely required, do you have another $2000 USD to resequence those isolates (and another 10 more) on a rapid barcoded run of a MinION?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...