Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • renuka22
    Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 22

    p-value and fold change

    Hello,

    I got my rna-seq analysis from the company and they have assigned p-value to each gene. Is it possible to have a p-value from only one set of data since I had sent only one batch and there were no replicates? Also, some of my genes have p>0.05 (not differentially expressed) but high fold-change increase. So which of the two should be considered important - p-value or fold change?

    Thanks
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    If you only sent them single samples from your groups then the p-values are largely meaningless. There's not a direct correspondence between fold-change and p-value, since lowly expressed genes will randomly show higher fold-changes (i.e., the p-value is a function of expression level and fold change).

    Comment

    • renuka22
      Member
      • Mar 2017
      • 22

      #3
      Ok. But can the p-value be between my control and treatment samples as this is what they mentioned in their analysis and p<0.05 means those genes are differentially expressed?

      Thanks

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        The presumption is that the p-value is from a poisson test, so yes it's between the two samples.

        Yes, p<0.05 would normally mean differentially expressed, aside from the fact that the p-values in your case are largely meaningless.

        Comment

        • renuka22
          Member
          • Mar 2017
          • 22

          #5
          So I guess the p-value is between technical replicates hence meaningless. Thanks a lot!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          12 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...