Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pbarros
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 7

    StringTie - isoforms not overlapping

    Hi,
    I am using StringTie for transcriptome reconstruction and identification of new isoforms.
    While I was exploring the "[file]-transcripts.gtf" output file from stringtie I found something that intrigued me... in the example below I show three isoforms resulting from the same gene ("STRG.14686") and the last one was present in the reference annotation. However the start and end coordinates do not match. The first two isoforms end at 394180 bp and 389422 bp, respectively, while the third starts at 396257 bp...


    scaffold_96 StringTie transcript 383404 394180 1000 + .gene_id "STRG.14686"; transcript_id "STRG.14686.1"; cov "72.829010"; FPKM "6.506798"; TPM "8.058224";
    scaffold_96 StringTie transcript 383404 389422 1000 + .gene_id "STRG.14686"; transcript_id "STRG.14686.2"; cov "61.675678"; FPKM "5.510321"; TPM "6.824155";
    scaffold_96 StringTie transcript 396257 398001 1000 + .gene_id "STRG.14686"; transcript_id "STRG.14686.3"; reference_id "scaffold_96.g39603.t1"; ref_gene_id "scaffold_96.g39603"; cov "2963.938721"; FPKM "264.808624"; TPM "327.947357";
    Why is StringTie "clustering" these isoforms in the same gene?
    Last edited by pbarros; 04-26-2017, 03:22 AM.
  • sdriscoll
    I like code
    • Sep 2009
    • 436

    #2
    first of all let me say that I agree with your interpretation. the third transcript does not overlap the first two and it has given all three the same 'gene_id' value.

    the only thing that comes to mind is that the assembly from stringtie, or cufflinks for that matter, is an attempted explanation, and often a simplification, of the alignment data. you may learn more about this by looking at the alignments in an alignment browser such as UCSC or IGV.

    while i doubt this, stringtie could be very, very smart and have assembled the third isoform from reads that multimapped between it and the first two transcripts which would imply they are all the same gene but one that is repeated in more than one position.
    /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
    Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

    Comment

    • pbarros
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 7

      #3
      thank you for the input sdriscoll ... maybe I was overthinking this

      cheers,
      pedro

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...