Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • honey
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 151

    Chip Seq which program to follow

    I wonder there are several programs for analyzing chip seq data and mostly it is algorithm for peak detection which is different. Some of available programs include- Seqmonk, Partek, R etc etc. My question is if we do analysis is in one it will have one list of regions and follow second it will be different so what will be the easiest rule to follow one. More less this was the same issue when expression arrays were started. Any suggestion will be highly appreciated. It look like one person will like one program while other may prefer second and so on.
  • simonandrews
    Simon Andrews
    • May 2009
    • 870

    #2
    Originally posted by honey View Post
    It look like one person will like one program while other may prefer second and so on.
    I think you hit the nail on the head right there.

    I'm not saying that there aren't differences between different programs for the analysis of ChIP-Seq data but there isn't going to be a single answer to which is the 'best'.

    You may find that some peak finding methods are more appropriate to certain kinds of ChIP-Seq than others (say transcription factors vs MeDIP vs histone mods) so the answer may partly depend on what type of data you have. You may also be influenced by your level of computer knowledge - using a command line linux app can be daunting if you've only ever used windows, and a graphical app may be a pain if you've got 100 samples to process.

    You may also want to look at the level of flexibility you have available. Do you really just want to do peak detection, or might you want to look at just analysing all promoters (for example), again this might point you towards a different subset of programs.

    The final thing to consider is if you know anyone who is comfortable using any of these systems already. Places like SeqAnswers are great, but there's nothing like having someone who already knows a package and who can come and help you out if you get stuck!

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...