Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jaeb
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2016
    • 2

    #1

    0% duplicates in RNA-Seq/Drop-seq library

    Hi all,

    I recently sequenced a cDNA Drop-Seq library on a HiSeq2500 and later to get more reads per cell on a HiSeq4000. I am a bit confused when looking at the "Sequence dublication level" plots of the FastQC reports:
    Percent of seqs remaining if deduplicated: HiSeq2500 25% (about 25Mio reads in total) and HiSeq4000 100% (100Mio reads in total)

    Could some one explain me this? So for my understanding, it means that the HiSeq4000 run somehow doesn't have sequencing duplicates - which is super-unlikely given the fact that a Drop-Seq library is generated by quite some PCR cycles. Also, if anything I would have expected more duplicates as the same library was just sequenced deeper.
    I don't know whether it matters, but cycle length was 180 in HiSeq2500 and 70 in HiSeq4000. The Q30 mean seq quality was 85% in HiSeq2500 and 65% in HiSeq4000.
    Any ideas on this issue are more than welcome. Thanks
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Jaeb; 05-28-2017, 12:55 AM.
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I agree with you that with deeper sequencing %duplicate should increase and read length differences are less likely to be the cause as FastQC uses initial 50 sequence of a subset of reads for duplicate calculation.

    It would be helpful if you could post the whole FastQC report for both runs as other plots might give some clues about the cause.

    Comment

    • Jaeb
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2016
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks for your fast reply. I did attach now the complete FastQC reports....

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        I think HS4000 reads contain lots of errors due to positional lower quality so the sequences of duplicates do not match and they are reported as unique reads. Also lots of reads seems to have very low quality over the whole length of read. If you trim or filter low quality reads you should get similar duplication rate for both runs.

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          I suggest that you run clumpify.sh from BBMap to get an exact idea of the duplication. You can allow for errors when doing the sequence match. FastQC does not look at the entire dataset for some of the modules (only a % of data is sampled).

          Even though there is a thread for clumpify here the one over at Biostars has the directions clearly defined on one page.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          32 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...