*or maximum
We are studying structural variation in several plant genomes Illmumina pair-end DNA re-sequencing, and noticed that the number of deletions in some samples (PINDEL) drops significantly. After having boldly calculated the depth as
[number of reads] x mean read length / genome size
we noticed that in these samples the depth was way lower (around 10 folds on an average of 50).
I was wondering if there is some lower or higher limit in a sample depth to start considering an adulterated result.
Thanks.
We are studying structural variation in several plant genomes Illmumina pair-end DNA re-sequencing, and noticed that the number of deletions in some samples (PINDEL) drops significantly. After having boldly calculated the depth as
[number of reads] x mean read length / genome size
we noticed that in these samples the depth was way lower (around 10 folds on an average of 50).
I was wondering if there is some lower or higher limit in a sample depth to start considering an adulterated result.
Thanks.