Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krobison
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2007
    • 734

    #1

    BFAST indexing for 50+36 SOLiD paired end?

    The BFAST manual gives one set of recommended seeds for reads <40 bp and one for greater than 40 bp

    What if I have a SOLiD paired end dataset with one read above that threshold (50) and one below (35)? Suggestions?
  • Chipper
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 323

    #2
    Tried bfast+bwa (latest release)?

    Comment

    • drio
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 323

      #3
      Originally posted by krobison View Post
      The BFAST manual gives one set of recommended seeds for reads <40 bp and one for greater than 40 bp

      What if I have a SOLiD paired end dataset with one read above that threshold (50) and one below (35)? Suggestions?
      Those keys will work fine for 35bp reads. You'll get a small decrease in the total number of alignments compared to 50bp reads. You could also explore
      bfast+bwa branch and use bwaaln for the second tag.
      -drd

      Comment

      • krobison
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2007
        • 734

        #4
        Thanks -- I've just started trying to figure out bfast+bwa & the new options it gives

        Comment

        • epigen
          Senior Member
          • May 2010
          • 101

          #5
          In this thread I posted my experience with this kind of PE reads:
          Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

          BFAST postprocess seems to rescue a lot of the 35 bp ends that did not get a match with bwaaln. (The bwaaln step might profit from allowing more mismatches instead of the default, but as I found with BWA on SOliD data that slows it down considerably.)
          Note that the git version of postprocess is an improvement over the one in the bfast+bwa package but still has a bug.
          Maybe it's because of the rather low quality of my data that the localalign step is now the most time-consuming part: 50 Mio read pairs on 8 CPUs usually take 70 h, some almost double the time. Multithreading is not that efficient that I'd want to use 16 threads (other people also want to use the cluster). I'm currently experimenting with the parameters.

          Comment

          • drio
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2008
            • 323

            #6
            @epigen: Take a look to this.
            -drd

            Comment

            • epigen
              Senior Member
              • May 2010
              • 101

              #7
              Thanks for the link, but I tried that before and it is not helping: far too many reads do not get paired. This patch is what I mean with the git version of postprocess, which does help (in terms of speedup and pairing, unfortunately with a bug):

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              21 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              18 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              36 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              42 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...