Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NicoBxl
    not just another member
    • Aug 2010
    • 264

    RT-PCR vs Next Gen Sequencing

    Hi,

    I'm looking after a way to compare ( differential expression ) Next Gen sequencing ( illumina ) and RT-PCR ( Applied TaqMan cards ) in the mirna field. We've the same samples for the two experiments of course.

    Anyone has an idea ?

    Thanks,

    Nicolas
  • NicoBxl
    not just another member
    • Aug 2010
    • 264

    #2
    nobody knows ?

    Comment

    • mrawlins
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 63

      #3
      For comparing samples of Illumina data I would use a Fisher Exact Test on quantile-normalized read counts to get a probability that two samples are the same. I'm not sure how I would do the same comparison for RT-PCR because I haven't done much experimentation with that.

      Comparing the Illumina directly to the RT-PCR will be difficult, because they will have different biases, distributions, etc. It would be best to compare two conditions on Illumina and the same two conditions with RT-PCR and see if they get the same or similar differences. You might be able to use some kind of T-test for that, but there may be easier tests to use. It will probably depend quite a bit on your experimental design how to best design the statistical testing.

      Comment

      • krobison
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2007
        • 734

        #4
        There are a number of papers in the literature making this comparison; perhaps you should start there?

        Try PubMed search for "rna-seq AND (rt-pcr OR qpcr)"

        Comment

        • upendra_35
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 102

          #5
          Its good to compare the NGS data with QPCR rather than RT-PCR.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          10 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          105 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          125 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...