Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Giorgio C
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 89

    454 - Transcriptome SNPs Detection

    Hy everybody,
    I have assembled a Transcriptome with Newbler and than blasted all the isotig.fna. I would estimate the number of SNPs and their frequency but manually is impossible. Is there any automate tool to do this? Can anyone help me?
    Thank you very much
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    I suggest that you use the Newbler 'mapper' instead of the assembler. This will automatically provide variants.

    Comment

    • Giorgio C
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 89

      #3
      Thank you, but i need to map with "EST database" or with for exemple "Ensemble trasncriptome 37"? Where can i find the frequency in the output files or the statistic number of the work (total number of SNP..etc) ???

      Comment

      • Kaurh5
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2013
        • 3

        #4
        Hi all!

        I am trying to assemble a low coverage 454 data of a plant using Newbler. I have two raw sff files from two different genotypes of my experimental plant. newbler completes the assembly step without a considerable error for the individual sffs. But when I try to assemble the sff files of both genotypes together(using incremental denovo assembly) it just adds up the total contigs and the singletons for that matter neglecting the possible common contigs between the two genotypes. To my understanding newbler is treating every read in both the sff files as unique which is very unlikely to happen. My basic aim is to find the SNPs and repeats in the genome and if newbler is assembling every read into a unique contig then this could be a matter of concern to me. Please provide the necessary explaination for this behaviour.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...