Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • glfrey
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2017
    • 6

    #1

    Removing contamination with BBDUK

    Hello,

    I have just used BBDUK to remove adaptor sequence and phix from some raw illumina HiSeq 2X100bp reads and I'm really pleased with the improvement it has made in my sequences reported by FASTQC. I was just hoping someone could help me with a couple of questions to help me better understand how BBDUK removes contamination from a read, and if I'm using it correctly.

    (1)When using BBDUK to remove adaptors, I chose to use mink to look for shorter adaptor sequence in my sequences than the chosen K=31 by using mink. Below are my parameters.

    ./bbduk.sh in=R1_001.fastq in2=R2_001.fastq minlen=51 mink=9 ktrim=r tbo tpe K=31 hdist=1 hdist2=1 ref=adapters.fa stats=stats_adaptor.txt out=R1_clean.fq out2=R2_clean.fq outm=ER1_adaptormatch.fq outm2=R2_adaptormatch.fq

    This worked beautifully but it occurred to me that to use mink, I had to choose a side to trim from. I chose ktrim=r, but after I had done ktrim=r, am I meant to be repeating the process using the same commands as above and only changing ktrim=l so that both ends of the read have been checked for shorter kmers of contamination and then trimmed?


    (2) My second question is about the removal of phix. I notice that in the post on seqanswers called "Introducing BBDuk: Adaptor/Quality Trimming and Filtering" that mink is not used unlike the adaptor search, just simply K=31. Is this because adaptor sequence is more likely to be present as a small fragment than the phix sequence?


    I apologise if these are basic questions, I'm a masters student and I'm trying to ensure I thoroughly DQ my reads as well as understand all of the operations being performed.

    Thank you all for your help.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    In Illumina data the adapter contamination should only be on the 3'-end of the read, if all things have gone as expected. So doing just ktrim=r is fine.

    If your data was multiplexed (i.e. it had an index/tag) then you should not have to worry about phiX. Illumina's phiX does not have an index and should get discarded as part of the normal demultiplexing process.

    @Brian recently provided this additional bbduk command to check for and remove phiX sequence and other known sequencing artifacts (e.g. control sequences from TruSeq kit).
    Code:
    bbduk.sh in=trimmed.fq.gz out=filtered.fq.gz k=31 ref=artifacts,phix ordered cardinality

    Comment

    • glfrey
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2017
      • 6

      #3
      Hi GenoMax,

      Thank you very much for your quick reply and explanations. I believe my data was multiplexed (it was already sequenced when I started my project), but BBDUK did find some phix sequence and discarded them into the outm files so I could be wrong. Also thank you for that command, I will give it a go on my sequences.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...