Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sdarko
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 52

    #1

    Determining gender of donors from RNASeq data

    Hi all,

    I have, what I think, is an interesting question/problem.

    We did some single-cell RNASeq (SMARTer prep, so whole transcripts not 3' tagging) on a group of samples. In healthy controls this population of T-cells is pretty darned rare so that in order to have enough cells to sort we combined HC donors in some cases. Luckily, in the "mixed" HC samples, one donor was male and the other female. The two donors in any given mixed sample are unrelated. To further complicate matters, any "mixed" population could be anywhere from 100% donor1 to 100% donor2.

    Now I've been asked to determine which single cell belonged to whom. My initial thought was that I could distinguish them based on the frequency of reads that align to the Y chromosome. Looking at the attached screenshot, that seems subpar.

    I've looked into HLA identification from RNASeq reads and identifying SNPs, but neither has been particularly fruitful.

    Does anyone have any suggestions?
    Attached Files
  • wdecoster
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 97

    #2
    I've done something similar, using a few genes which are gender specific, rather than only Y chromosome genes. Note that you should think about the pseudoautosomal regions.

    I right now don't have the time to go in depth on this, but I hope the code in the following script can point you in the right direction: https://github.com/wdecoster/DEA.R/b...DEA/DEA.R#L198

    Comment

    • sdarko
      Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 52

      #3
      Thanks for the tip.

      I grabbed the genes from your link, subsetted my expression matrix, trained a random forest classifier using the gene set and known genders (with greater then 99% out-of-bag accuracy) and then used that model to assign the unknown genders.

      I think it worked well.
      Last edited by sdarko; 10-18-2017, 01:10 PM.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Yesterday, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      71 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...